2016
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anchors aweigh: The impact of overlearning on entrenchment effects in statistical learning.

Abstract: Previous research has found that when learners encounter multiple artificial languages in succession only the first is learned, unless there are contextual cues correlating with the change in structure or if exposure to the second language is protracted. These experiments provided a fixed amount of exposure irrespective of when learning occurred. Here, we presented learners with two consecutive artificial languages testing learning after each minute of familiarization. In Experiment 1, learners received fixed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
41
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(103 reference statements)
5
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results find additional support from a recent behavioral study demonstrating that when learners are advanced to L2 immediately after acquiring L1, they are less likely to exhibit a primacy effect relative to learners who received additional L1 input after successful L1 acquisition before encountering L2 (Bulgarelli & Weiss, 2016). In the context of this study, neural patterns from these “inefficient” L1 learners contrast with those “efficient” learners in whom decreased activation in posterior parietal cortex during early exposure is associated with lower L2, but higher L1, learning outcomes, a result not altogether surprising given the inverse correlation between L1 and L2 posttest scores.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These results find additional support from a recent behavioral study demonstrating that when learners are advanced to L2 immediately after acquiring L1, they are less likely to exhibit a primacy effect relative to learners who received additional L1 input after successful L1 acquisition before encountering L2 (Bulgarelli & Weiss, 2016). In the context of this study, neural patterns from these “inefficient” L1 learners contrast with those “efficient” learners in whom decreased activation in posterior parietal cortex during early exposure is associated with lower L2, but higher L1, learning outcomes, a result not altogether surprising given the inverse correlation between L1 and L2 posttest scores.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…If infants can track each set of regularities separately, then participants in both conditions should exhibit learning. However, it was possible that participants would exhibit a primacy effect, only exhibiting learning in the Initial Language condition (as observed in similarlystructured adult studies; Gebhart et al, 2009;Bulgarelli & Weiss, 2016). Alternatively, infants might exhibit a recency effect, only exhibiting learning in the Final Language condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Bilingualism may benefit the tracking of transitional probabilities in a complex word segmentation task (Wang & Saffran, 2014), as well as the acquisition of multiple mappings in statistical word-referent paradigms (Benitez, Yurovsky, & Smith, 2016;Poepsel & Weiss, 2016). However, several studies examining multi-language segmentation in adult bilinguals have failed to find an advantage for bilinguals relative to monolinguals (e.g., Bogulski, 2013;Bulgarelli & Weiss, 2016). Whether bilingual experience benefits infants' statistical learning of multiple incongruent speech streams is an open question for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If infants can track each set of regularities separately, then participants in both conditions should exhibit learning. However, it was possible that participants would exhibit a primacy effect, only exhibiting learning in the Initial Language condition (as observed in similarly structured adult studies; Bulgarelli & Weiss, ; Gebhart et al, ). Alternatively, infants might exhibit a recency effect, only exhibiting learning in the Final Language condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%