1986
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1986.03780060083014
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Anaphylactic Reaction to Lidocaine

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
58
6
1
0

Citation Types

0
12
0
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
42
22
1

Relationship

0
65

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 64 publications

(12 citation statements)
references

References 14 publications

0
12
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Unfortunately, there is no reliable in vitro allergy diagnostic test available for routine use . Type I hypersensitivity to lidocaine has been confirmed by demonstrating specific IgE antibodies against the drug and was reported in relatively few cases . In this report, the skin prick test was negative, but the intradermal test was strongly positive.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In the intravenous challenge test, although the patient exhibited suspected allergic responses at a lidocaine dose of 20 ng, the minimal allergy provocation dose was 30 ng, at which symptoms and signs appeared. The patient fell into anaphylaxis after the intravenous injection of 5 mg of lidocaine, and there have been reports of using the usual or full therapeutic dose of intravenous lidocaine . The precise minimal allergy provocation dose according to the intravenous provocation test was not described well, which may be because there was no established concept for desensitization at that time.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation