2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22110-1_54
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Abstract. Recent work in robotics has applied formal verification tools to automatically generate correct-by-construction controllers for autonomous robots. However, when it is not possible to create such a controller, these approaches do not provide the user with feedback on the source of failure, making the experience of debugging a specification somewhat ad hoc and unstructured, and a source of frustration for the user. This paper describes an extension to the LTLMoP toolkit for robot mission planning that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [28], an algorithm was defined to report a reason as to why a GR(1) LTL specification is unrealizable. The work in [15] presents a method of changing an unsatisfiable nondeterministic Büchi automaton into the "closest" satisfiable one, where all actions of the robot are represented using a finite state machine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28], an algorithm was defined to report a reason as to why a GR(1) LTL specification is unrealizable. The work in [15] presents a method of changing an unsatisfiable nondeterministic Büchi automaton into the "closest" satisfiable one, where all actions of the robot are represented using a finite state machine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a robot task as an LTL formula belonging to the fragment described above, if the task is synthesizable [18] an automaton whose behaviors satisfy the formula will be automatically generated (see [17,14] for details).…”
Section: B Discrete Abstraction Of the Workpacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if a specification contains behaviors that cannot be guaranteed (they may be inconsistent or there may be an environment in which the robot fails), no automaton will be synthesized and LTLMoP facilitates the process of understanding the problem in the given specification [18]. The experiments described in this paper were executed using LTLMoP as further discussed in Section VI.…”
Section: Ltl Mission Planner (Ltlmop)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is related to [21], [22], where the authors study the following problem: given an LTL specification and a model of a robot that does not satisfy this specification, decide whether or not the invalidity is limited to the provided model. Related literature includes also [6], where the authors aim to pinpoint the (un)realizable fragments of the specification to reveal causes of the specification violation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%