2016
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical performances of food microbiology laboratories - critical analysis of 7 years of proficiency testing results

Abstract: This study draws the attention of the laboratories to the main causes of analytical errors and suggests practical solutions to avoid them, in an educational purpose. The observations support the hypothesis that regular participation to PT, when followed by feed-back and appropriate corrective actions, can play a key role in quality improvement and provide more confidence in the laboratory testing results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering this, the high sensitivity of the assay is important to prevent the potential for false negative results, which can be rather problematic in food safety monitoring. False negatives are still a challenge, with a percentage of culture analysis results yielding false negative results [28,29]. In order to test the working range of our assay in a standard condition, we lysed bacterial samples of E. coli O157:H7 at concentrations ranging from 10 6 to 1 CFU/mL.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sensitivity In Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering this, the high sensitivity of the assay is important to prevent the potential for false negative results, which can be rather problematic in food safety monitoring. False negatives are still a challenge, with a percentage of culture analysis results yielding false negative results [28,29]. In order to test the working range of our assay in a standard condition, we lysed bacterial samples of E. coli O157:H7 at concentrations ranging from 10 6 to 1 CFU/mL.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sensitivity In Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%