2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical fragility curves for assessment of the seismic vulnerability of HP/HT unburied subsea pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seismic inputs are applied to the soil domain in the transversal direction at a depth of 25 m. In order to calculate the bending response, the pipeline was modelled as an isotropic bilinear material (yield stress σy = 448 MPa and tangent modulus Et = 2100 MPa). The strains are calculated at the central point, at the crown of the buckled pipeline (Mina et al 2020), and then compared against the failure criteria outlined in the next section.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The seismic inputs are applied to the soil domain in the transversal direction at a depth of 25 m. In order to calculate the bending response, the pipeline was modelled as an isotropic bilinear material (yield stress σy = 448 MPa and tangent modulus Et = 2100 MPa). The strains are calculated at the central point, at the crown of the buckled pipeline (Mina et al 2020), and then compared against the failure criteria outlined in the next section.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design compressive strain εSd for different classes are represented in Table 3. The strain at failure (local buckling of the compressive side) from the FE analysis (Mina et al, 2020) is also given in Table 3. Fragility curves were applied in order to consider a probabilistic-based methodology to assess the role of soil deformability on the behaviour of HP/HT unburied subsea pipelines, as previously applied in Mina et al (2020), Forcellini (2020b and2021).…”
Section: Pipeline Failure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations