2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2750722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Calculation of Rician K-Factor for Indoor Wireless Channel Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 demonstrates the robustness of hieP M to the Rician AR-1 fading channel model described above with coherence time T c = 2 ms of the AR process β t , and a Rician factor K r = 10 (this is a reasonable value, e.g. indoor mmWave channel models [27]). We again use an erroneous/mismatched and fixed estimate of the fading coefficientα t =α 0 ∼ CN (α 0 , σ 2 α ) for t = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Time Varying Channelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…9 demonstrates the robustness of hieP M to the Rician AR-1 fading channel model described above with coherence time T c = 2 ms of the AR process β t , and a Rician factor K r = 10 (this is a reasonable value, e.g. indoor mmWave channel models [27]). We again use an erroneous/mismatched and fixed estimate of the fading coefficientα t =α 0 ∼ CN (α 0 , σ 2 α ) for t = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Time Varying Channelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Rician KF statistics is a measure of the ratio of LOS‐to‐NLOS strength and its value affects the performance of MIMO systems significantly [32]. The presence of LOS component translates to stronger propagation and larger signal‐to‐noise ratio [22].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance of DSRC and LTE‐A with the mmWave massive MIMO advocated in this work, we characterise the vehicular channel using PL, root‐mean‐square delay spread (τ RMS), Rician K ‐factor (KF), number of clusters, number of resolvable MPCs/rays/subpaths, power delay profile (PDP), channel rank, channel condition number and data rate ( R ). For the analysis, PL is evaluated using (3) in Section 2.2 while the RMS delay spread τ RMS is evaluated using the following equation [31]: τ RMS = false∑ c = 1 N cl s = 1 N s p , c τ c , s 2 P RX , c , s false∑ c = 1 N cl s = 1 N s p , c P RX , c , s )( c = 1 N cl false∑ s = 1 N sp , c τ c , s P RX , c , s c = 1 N cl false∑ s = 1 N sp , c P RX , c , s 2 The Rician KF is evaluated using the following equation [32]: KF = P RX , c = 1 , s = 1 )( c = 1 N cl false∑ s = 1 N s …”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation parameter g is set such that coherence time T c = 2 ms (equivalent to τ = 28 total slots using the 5G NR PRACH format B4 [15]), and a Rician factor k r = 10 (this is a reasonable value, e.g. indoor mmWave channel models [16]). For these parameters, we assume a conservative range for α t to be: [r min , r max ] = [0, 2], [z min , z max ] = [−0.7, 0.7], with resolution parameters 1 r = 1 z = 50 3 .…”
Section: A Simulation Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%