2007
DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.19.2077-b
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Analytic Approaches to Observational Studies With Treatment Selection Bias

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
7
3
3
0

Citation Types

0
8
0
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
12
1

Relationship

0
13

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
8
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the impact of smaller studies on cumulative estimates was marginal. We also corrected for observational bias by calculating unadjusted and adjusted estimates of key outcome measures, and by performing sensitivity analyses to examine the potential influence of double counting and inclusion of SITS-MOST data [50]. The overall consistency of the outcome estimates in our analyses supports the contention that our findings are accurate and provide a useful quantitative summary of current phase 4 evidence for the use of IV-TPA according to the NINDS protocol in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…However, the impact of smaller studies on cumulative estimates was marginal. We also corrected for observational bias by calculating unadjusted and adjusted estimates of key outcome measures, and by performing sensitivity analyses to examine the potential influence of double counting and inclusion of SITS-MOST data [50]. The overall consistency of the outcome estimates in our analyses supports the contention that our findings are accurate and provide a useful quantitative summary of current phase 4 evidence for the use of IV-TPA according to the NINDS protocol in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Additionally, observations research is the preferred design for discovery of adverse events. 24 An additional strength of this study is the use of statistical techniques to lower the incidence of false discovery rates. False discovery rates guard against incorrect declarations of statistical significance, leading to potential changes in clinical care that are attributable to chance alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…The mechanism whereby stroke units achieve their efficacy has not been precisely elucidated [20], and given the broad range of settings from which these observational data were collected, potentially significant differences in the components of stroke unit care provided are likely. Furthermore, traditional adjustments for treatment selection bias have been found to be unreliable [21]. By compensating on a study‐by‐study basis not only for systematic bias but also the precision bias which is expected especially in larger observational studies, this Bayesian analysis offers a more conservative approach to observational data interpretation, and thereby maximizes reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.