1979
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1979.10885204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Undergraduates’ Attendance at Class Meetings with and without Grade-Related Contingencies: A Contrast Effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average attendance was just 6 out of 8 classes and 20% of students attended fewer than half the classes. These attendance rates fall between the upper and lower estimates for US universities (Hovell et al, 1979;Van Blerkom, 1992) and suggest that the present sample is likely to be representative of students at other higher education institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Average attendance was just 6 out of 8 classes and 20% of students attended fewer than half the classes. These attendance rates fall between the upper and lower estimates for US universities (Hovell et al, 1979;Van Blerkom, 1992) and suggest that the present sample is likely to be representative of students at other higher education institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Similarly, Romer (1993) found that students who attended just 25% of his economics lectures achieved an average grade of C-, whereas students who attended all of the lectures achieved an average grade of B+ (see also Brocato, 1989;Clump, Bauer, & Whiteleather, 2003;Friedman, Rodriguez, & McComb, 2001;Gump, 2005;Gunn, 1993;Launius, 1997;Park & Kerr, 1990;Schmidt, 1983;Van Blerkom, 1992;Wyatt, 1992). However, rates of attendance are often relatively low; for an individual session at a prestigious US university, estimates of the percentage of students in attendance vary from 59% (Hovell, Williams, & Semb, 1979) to 93% (Van Blerkom, 1992), and a small minority of students attend only a few sessions (Romer, 1993). Non-attendance therefore represents a significant challenge to teaching staff (Brauer, 1994), institutions of higher learning (Devadoss & Foltz, 1996), and policy makers (Epp & Epp, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some previous studies did not uncover positive and significant evidence, a number did support the use of quizzes to enhance exam performance. Empirical evidence from these studies shows that quizzes (announced or unannounced) may have several instructional purposes, such as: (1) enhancing students' attendance (e.g., Hovell, Williams and Semb, 1979;Wilder, Flood, and Stromnes, 2001;Azorlosa and Renner, 2006;Azorlosa, 2011 and2012;Braun and Sellers, 2012), (2) increasing students' participation (e.g., Braun and Sellers, 2012), (3) augmenting students' preparation prior to an exam (e.g., Rusico, 2001;Marchant, 2002;Azorlosa and Renner, 2006;Azorlosa, 2011 and2012;Braun and Sellers, 2012), (4) acting as an effective feedback mechanism (e.g., Metha, 1995;Bell, 1996), and (5) improving students' exam performance (e.g., Turney, 1931;Geist and Soehren, 1997;Graham, 1999;Landrum, 2007;Kamuche, 2005 andAzorlosa, 2011 and2012). Below, we briefly present selected studies relating to these five objectives.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes class assignments like readings, as well as attendance at class meetings. Yet there is evidence that when students attend and do the assigned tasks, they perform better (Hovell & Williams, 1979;Wong & Wong, 1979). In terms of online work, evidence suggests that students who participate more do better overall (Davies & Graff, 2005;Nagel, Blignaut, & Cronjé, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%