2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the beam-pointing stability in the high power laser system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of δox and δoy distribution can also prove that the system plays a significant positive role in stabilizing the beam pointing. In addition, the following equation was introduced to analyze the beam pointing stability quantitatively: 45 Δθ=1Nj=1N(δjf)2,where δj is the j’th position offset, f is the focal length of the focusing lens (128 mm), and N is the total amount of measured position offset data.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of δox and δoy distribution can also prove that the system plays a significant positive role in stabilizing the beam pointing. In addition, the following equation was introduced to analyze the beam pointing stability quantitatively: 45 Δθ=1Nj=1N(δjf)2,where δj is the j’th position offset, f is the focal length of the focusing lens (128 mm), and N is the total amount of measured position offset data.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinate systems of FSM1 and FSM2 are obtained by rotating the original spatial coordinate system clockwise by 45 10) and (11), respectively. R 2 and R 3 are the rotation matrices of FSM1 and FSM2 in their coordinate systems, respectively, as shown in Eqs.…”
Section: > > > mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporally variable thermal expansion of the laser crystal and mechanical vibrations disturbing laser sources are the main factors of the jitter of beamlets 1 and 2. [18] The rms values of the pointing jitter for the combined beam are 𝜎 𝑋 = 8.5 µrad and 𝜎 𝑌 = 5.7 µrad (Fig. 6(c)).…”
Section: Fsmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The obvious drift of the laser spot on the imaging plane caused by the change of the influencing factors reflected the absolute location accuracy of the system, which was evaluated by the drifting RMS [17,18], as shown in equations ( 16) and ( 17)…”
Section: Absolute Location Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%