“…Doxycycline reduced the relative mRNA expression of MCP-1 (Control = 1.00 ± 0.08, ethanol = 2.90 ± 0.10, ethanol + doxycycline = 2.57 ± 0.11, n = 3, *** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05, Figure 6 C), E-selectin (Control = 0.95 ± 0.05, ethanol = 7.54 ± 0.36, ethanol + doxycycline = 6.00 ± 0.71, n = 3, *** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05, Figure 6 D), ICAM-1 (Control = 1.00 ± 0.13, ethanol = 8.52 ± 0.21, ethanol + doxycycline = 7.21 ± 0.38, n = 3, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, Figure 6 E) and VCAM-1 (Control = 1.00 ± 0.08, ethanol = 1.95 ± 0.19, ethanol + doxycycline = 1.41 ± 0.15, n = 3, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 Figure 6 F) in HUVECs treated with ethanol. The senescent cells are known to show impaired migration [ 24 , 25 ]; therefore, we investigated the effects of ethanol and ethanol combined with doxycycline on endothelial cell migration. Ethanol retarded the migration of HUVECs in wound assay, and doxycycline recovered the migration of HUVECs exposed to ethanol, percentage area covered by migrating endothelial cells at different time points after making a scratch (at 0 h: Control = 0.00 ± 0.01%, ethanol = 0.00 ± 0.00%, ethanol + doxycycline = 0.00 ± 0.00%, after 6 h: Control = 36.27 ± 7.03%, ethanol = 24.20 ± 5.36%, ethanol + doxycycline = 33.00 ± 25.87%, after 12 h: Control = 78.18 ± 7.57%, ethanol = 50.83 ± 9.41%, ethanol + doxycycline = 79.65 ± 4.35%, after 24 h: Control = 99.77 ± 0.23%, ethanol = 82.30 ± 13.40%, ethanol + doxycycline = 96.56 ± 5.64%, n = 3, ** p < 0.01, Figure 6 G,H).…”