2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40101-015-0063-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of physiological signals for recognition of boredom, pain, and surprise emotions

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of the study was to examine the differences of boredom, pain, and surprise. In addition to that, it was conducted to propose approaches for emotion recognition based on physiological signals.MethodsThree emotions, boredom, pain, and surprise, are induced through the presentation of emotional stimuli and electrocardiography (ECG), electrodermal activity (EDA), skin temperature (SKT), and photoplethysmography (PPG) as physiological signals are measured to collect a dataset from 217 participants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
91
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed biometric patterns exhibited by our participants are unlikely to be reflective of other processes such as the relief of pain or the onset of sleep. Previous literature on biometric response to pain has demonstrated significant rise in EDA during painful stimuli and to a lesser degree decrease in skin temperature [16,17]. We would expect that if the changes were simply due to relief of pain, a marked decrease in EDA would occur, which was not observed in our study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The observed biometric patterns exhibited by our participants are unlikely to be reflective of other processes such as the relief of pain or the onset of sleep. Previous literature on biometric response to pain has demonstrated significant rise in EDA during painful stimuli and to a lesser degree decrease in skin temperature [16,17]. We would expect that if the changes were simply due to relief of pain, a marked decrease in EDA would occur, which was not observed in our study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Previous studies have provided evidence for general recognition rate from 57,77% to 85,46% for different emotional states, that more higher set of analyzed signals and more recognized emotions provides better results [64][65][66]. High-observed recognition accuracy was also in research by Jang et al: 84.7% [58].…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Research by Jang et al used ECG, EDA, SKT and more sophistical machine learning (ML) algorithms [58]:…”
Section: Physiological Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde fines de la década de los 80s y hasta el presente se conoce que la expresión facial incrementa la actividad autonómica (Levenson, Ekman & Friesen, 1990); en el caso del reconocimiento de la expresión facial de dolor también hay cambios psicofisiológicos cardiovasculaes (Jang, Park, Park, Kim & Sohn, 2015). Esto posibilita que, si el personal de salud no cuenta con el entrenamiento en reconocimiento de microexpresiones faciales, se puede optar por una cámara de imagen térmica infrarroja (iTF), una herramienta portátil de registro psicofisiológico, útil para la valoración de actividad autonómica asociada al dolor.…”
Section: Figuraunclassified