1992
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(92)90232-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of DNA strand break induction and repair in plants from the vicinity of Chernobyl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An improved DNA repair capacity and ability to germinate under abiotic stresses (salinity and accelerated ageing) was shown in seed embryos of evening primrose growing near the Chernobyl NPP on sites contaminated with c-and b-emitters, while on the a-, b-and c-contaminated site such an improvement was not found (Boubriak et al 2008). This is in line with data on the successful adaptation of wild vetch populations living on sites most highly contaminated by b-emitters, but not by a-emitters (Syomov et al 1992). Consequently, there are good theoretical and practical reasons for more attention being paid to the mechanisms by which populations become more radioresistant, and to those situations where radio-adaptation appears not to be taking place.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An improved DNA repair capacity and ability to germinate under abiotic stresses (salinity and accelerated ageing) was shown in seed embryos of evening primrose growing near the Chernobyl NPP on sites contaminated with c-and b-emitters, while on the a-, b-and c-contaminated site such an improvement was not found (Boubriak et al 2008). This is in line with data on the successful adaptation of wild vetch populations living on sites most highly contaminated by b-emitters, but not by a-emitters (Syomov et al 1992). Consequently, there are good theoretical and practical reasons for more attention being paid to the mechanisms by which populations become more radioresistant, and to those situations where radio-adaptation appears not to be taking place.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An improved DNA repair capacity and ability to germinate under abiotic stress was shown in seeds embryos of evening primrose growing near the Chernobyl NPP on sites contaminated with -and -emitters, while on the -, -and -contaminated site such an improvement was not found [19]. This is in line with data on the successful adaptation of wild vetch populations on sites most highly contaminated by -emitters, but not by -emitters [20]. Consequently, there are good theoretical and practical reasons for more attention being paid to the mechanisms by which populations become more radioresistant, and to those situations where radio-adaptation appears not to be taking place.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Mutations, although important and powerful tools of adaptation, are definitely not the sole basis for development of plant adaptive responses, as most of them are deleterious. Many excellent papers appearing during the last 5 to 7 years have demonstrated the harmful effects of Chernobyl radiation on the genetic apparatus of plant, animal, and human populations exposed for different periods of time (Syomov et al, 1992;Dubrova et al, 1996;Satoh and Kodaira, 1996;Ellegren et al, 1997;Kovalchuk et al, 1998Kovalchuk et al, , 2000bKovalchuk et al, , 2003a, The progeny of plants that were collected in 1990 from control (CT), Chernobyl (Ch), and Tolsty Les (TL), experimental plots was germinated in sterile conditions. In the course of this experiment, one set of 14-dold control and Chernobyl plants were placed in 100 mM RB for 2 h. The other set of plants was irradiated with x-rays (1 Gy) and frozen 2 h after exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been conducted to analyze plant performance under acute and chronic radiation exposure. They revealed a high frequency of chromosome aberrations in Crepis tectorum, winter rye (Secale cereale), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) populations grown in the Chernobyl exclusion zone (Shevchenko and Grinikh, 1990;Shkvarnikov, 1990;Ziablitskaia et al, 1996), increased incidences of DNA single-strand breaks (Syomov et al, 1992), increased frequency of embryonic lethal mutants (Abramov et al, 1992), as well as pronounced dose-dependent genome destabilization (Kovalchuk et al, 1998(Kovalchuk et al, , 2000b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%