1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199811)23:3<185::aid-mc7>3.0.co;2-5
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Analysis of centrosome abnormalities and angiogenesis in epidermal-targetedp53172H mutant andp53-knockout mice after chemical carcinogenesis: Evidence for a gain of function
Abstract: We previously developed a transgenic mouse model that expresses in the epidermis a murine p53172R-->H mutant (p53m) under the control of a human keratin-1-based vector (HK1.p53m). In contrast to mice with wild-type p53 and p53-knockout mice, HK1.p53m mice exhibit increased susceptibility to chemical carcinogenesis, with greatly accelerated benign papilloma formation, malignant conversion, and metastasis. In the study presented here, we examined the expression pattern of several differentiation markers and obse…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
38
10
9
1
Citation Types
3
35
0
0
Year Published
1999
2023
Publication Types
Select...
43
6
4
1
Relationship
4
50
Authors
Journals
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
References 17 publications
3
35
0
0
“…The enhanced genomic instability in GOF p53 SCCs led to the retention of specific genomic alterations targeting powerful oncogenes as Myc and Aurora-A. Furthermore, the presence of metastatic and EMT signatures coupled with the absence of genomic instability signatures suggests that GOF p53 SCCs acquired genomic instability at an early stage of tumor evolution, consistent with the presence of centrosome amplification, a hallmark feature of genomic instability in cancer (Fukasawa, 2005), previously observed in papillomas that expressed the GOF p53 mutant (Caulin et al , 2007; Wang et al , 1998). Taken together our results indicate that LOF p53 SCCs acquire genomic instability at a late stage in their tumor development, thereby delaying the emergence of metastases which is consistent with previous reports for p53 -null skin tumors (Caulin et al , 2007; Kemp et al , 1993), whereas GOF p53 tumors acquire genomic instability at an early stage of cancer progression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The enhanced genomic instability in GOF p53 SCCs led to the retention of specific genomic alterations targeting powerful oncogenes as Myc and Aurora-A. Furthermore, the presence of metastatic and EMT signatures coupled with the absence of genomic instability signatures suggests that GOF p53 SCCs acquired genomic instability at an early stage of tumor evolution, consistent with the presence of centrosome amplification, a hallmark feature of genomic instability in cancer (Fukasawa, 2005), previously observed in papillomas that expressed the GOF p53 mutant (Caulin et al , 2007; Wang et al , 1998). Taken together our results indicate that LOF p53 SCCs acquire genomic instability at a late stage in their tumor development, thereby delaying the emergence of metastases which is consistent with previous reports for p53 -null skin tumors (Caulin et al , 2007; Kemp et al , 1993), whereas GOF p53 tumors acquire genomic instability at an early stage of cancer progression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Interestingly, expression of`gain of function' mutants of p53 has also been shown to enhance drug resistance, interfere with p53-independent apoptosis, and induce centrosome abnormalities in cells expressing them (Blandino et al, 1999;Li et al, 1998;Murphy et al, 2000;Sigal and Rotter, 2000;Wang et al, 1998). It is not known whether mutant p53-mediated transactivation is involved as the etiologic agent for these phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…These are phenotypes not caused by WT p53 that are seen when mutant p53s are expressed in p53 null cells. Several gain-of-function phenotypes have been found for various p53 mutants such as increased cell growth (10,11), enhanced tumorigenicity (11)(12)(13)(14)(15) and invasiveness (11,13,16), disturbed spindle checkpoint (17,18), and resistance to cytotoxic agents (19). Furthermore, it was shown that the expression of p53 mutants V134A and C132F caused cells to become resistant to transforming growth factor (TGF)--mediated growth suppression (12,20).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
