2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops 2010
DOI: 10.1109/waina.2010.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Anonymity in P2P Anonymous Communication Systems

Abstract: Compared with traditional static Client/Server architecture, the P2P architecture is more suitable for anonymous communication systems because it is more flexible and can keep load balance better. However, in order to make the system usable and reliable, some system designs make tradeoffs between anonymity and performance such as reliability, latency and throughput. Tradeoffs are sometimes unavoidable in system design, but which tradeoffs are acceptable and which are not is very important for developers. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APAC can also be adjusted to select all intermediate nodes globally to avoid choosing disproportionate number of adversarial peers. For a given circuit, by controlling the first relay, the responder and at least half of the intermediate peers alternatively in the circuit, the adversary can determine the initiator [75]. We show that an adversarial placement of peers (e.g., placing more peers nearby the victim) does not give significant advantage over a randomized placement by an honest-but-curious adversary (details in Appendix A).…”
Section: Design Of Apacmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…APAC can also be adjusted to select all intermediate nodes globally to avoid choosing disproportionate number of adversarial peers. For a given circuit, by controlling the first relay, the responder and at least half of the intermediate peers alternatively in the circuit, the adversary can determine the initiator [75]. We show that an adversarial placement of peers (e.g., placing more peers nearby the victim) does not give significant advantage over a randomized placement by an honest-but-curious adversary (details in Appendix A).…”
Section: Design Of Apacmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus to confirm one of the controlled nodes is the first relay (only when the adversary knows the length), the adversary has to control the responder and some intermediate nodes in the circuit to reconstruct the circuit. For a given circuit, by controlling the first relay, the responder and at least half of the intermediate peers alternatively in the circuit, the adversary can determine the initiator [75]. However, we consider the worst case that the adversary can learn the distance between any two controlled peers by passively logging forwarded requests and transmit- ted data as well as timing attacks 5 .…”
Section: Analysis Of Initiator Anonymitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohajeri et al [23] analyzed the new obfuscation protocol of Tor, and an application of this protocol as SkypeMorph. Zhang et al [25] investigated the anonymity of different anonymous communication systems. They modeled the P2P anonymous communications and took quantitative analysis of anonymity by information theory with entropy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, P2P (peer-to-peer) network has gathered broad attentions because of the fact that the peer nodes have no need to be with the help of intermediate servers to achieve the purpose of communicating with each other. Besides, it has become a technology which has a bright future [6]. In the last decade, the number of applications based on P2P technology has been increasing, such as BT, PPLive and eDonkey, Thunder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loop(2) Search (in packet, SA, DA, SP, DP, Pro) (3) {//get the five-tuple information (4) for ( = 1; ≤ 3; ++) (5) {//traverse three level bloom filters;(6) for ( = 1; ≤ ; ++) (7)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%