Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-3268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of adaptive neural networks for helicopter flight controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the expression in (7) and the subsequent stability analysis, the control input is designed as (13) where are positive definite, diagonal matrices of constant control gains, was defined in (4), and denotes the identity matrix. To simplify the notation in the subsequent stability analysis, the constant auxiliary matrix is defined as (14) where can be separated into diagonal (i.e., ) and off-diagonal (i.e., ) components as (15) After substituting the time derivative of (13) into (7), the following closed-loop error system is obtained:…”
Section: A Error Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the expression in (7) and the subsequent stability analysis, the control input is designed as (13) where are positive definite, diagonal matrices of constant control gains, was defined in (4), and denotes the identity matrix. To simplify the notation in the subsequent stability analysis, the constant auxiliary matrix is defined as (14) where can be separated into diagonal (i.e., ) and off-diagonal (i.e., ) components as (15) After substituting the time derivative of (13) into (7), the following closed-loop error system is obtained:…”
Section: A Error Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several efforts (cf., [7], [14]- [17]) have been developed for the more general problem where the uncertain parameters or the inversion mismatch terms do not satisfy the linear-in-the-parameters assumption (i.e., non-LP). One method to compensate for non-LP uncertainty is to exploit a neural network as an online function approximation method as in [15] and [16]; however, all of these results yield uniformly ultimately bounded stability due to the inherent function reconstruction error. In [14] and [18], bounded aircraft tracking is proven using DI-based control strategies, where neural networks are utilized to compensate for model error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flight control system design is considered one of the core issues in the development of a fully functional unmanned helicopter, many control system designs have been developed for controlling the dynamic process of miniature helicopter; few among those designs are readily suitable for applying [5]. Several controller design methods are successfully implemented as control technologies such as the adaptive control [6,7], optimal control [8], neural network approach [9,10], the robust and H ∞ control approach [11], and fuzzy logic [12]. However, many of these reported works have one common drawback, they focus merely on the basic miniature helicopter equations of motion without including both the swashplate and mixer mechanism dynamics within miniature helicopter mathematical model, so the efficiency of control system is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To name a few, in [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], neural networks were fused with ADI based controllers where boundedness of the tracking error was ensured, however the aforementioned studies were unable to prove asymptotic tracking. In [22] and [23], Shin et al developed a tracking controller by fusing robust integral of the signum of the error (RISE) feedback with neural network feedforward terms for a rotorcraft-based UAV and guaranteed semi-global asymptotic tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%