17th International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics and Communications, 2003. ICECom 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/icecom.2003.1290996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a GSM base station antenna near conductive object: far field pattern distortion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite typically these kind of low visual impact products are claimed to be RF-transparent, from the simulation an average back radiation increase of 1.27 dB in azimuth and 3.47 dB in elevation was found. This result is in line with the findings in [6] which predicted a FBR reduction of 2.43 dB for a circular radome of 650 mm of diameter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite typically these kind of low visual impact products are claimed to be RF-transparent, from the simulation an average back radiation increase of 1.27 dB in azimuth and 3.47 dB in elevation was found. This result is in line with the findings in [6] which predicted a FBR reduction of 2.43 dB for a circular radome of 650 mm of diameter.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Table IV provides a detailed summary of the distortion caused by each of the different elements on the front and back radiation lobes. These results combined with previous observations confirm that, in general, mounting structures and nearby obstacles have a small impact on the radiation pattern in agreement with [5], [6] and [7]. By considering the full rooftop scenario with radome plus rooftop and nearby chimney, the minimum azimuth FBR is reduced in 4.78 dB compared to the original reference of 20 dB.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conductive objects in the vicinity of the antenna distort the radiation pattern [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. To our knowledge, this problem is not addressed in references on electromagnetic field calculation around base stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%