“…Alternatively, sustained concentrations of MDMA (or MDA) hours after administration, rather than initial high peak MDMA levels, such as those seen after subcutaneous administration (Figure 1), may be more closely related to the neurotoxic process. Regardless of which pharmacokinetic parameter is most closely linked to MDMA's long-term effects, the pharmacokinetic profile differences presently observed suggest that, if a goal is to elucidate possible long-term effects of MDMA in humans, the oral route of administration may be preferable in preclinical studies, because it avoids the higher initial MDMA C max , as well as the greater AUC, observed after subcutaneous administration, and because it engenders a pharmacokinetic profile that more closely resembles that seen in humans (Helmlin et al, 1996;de la Torre et al, 2000de la Torre et al, , 2004Pacifici et al, 2002). Although in our initial route of administration/pharmacokinetic study we cannot definitively exclude an order effect (because the subcutaneous route was tested before the oral route), we do not believe it accounts for the observed differences because, on average, 8 weeks had elapsed between subcutaneous and oral MDMA testing (Table 1).…”