2011
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-s1-p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and comparison of 2D fingerprints: insights into database screening performance using eight fingerprint methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, in order to apply ML methods for dealing with cheminformatic problems, the structures of chemical compounds need to be properly represented. One of the most popular approaches to this task is fingerprinting that is translating a compound into the form of a bit string coding information about its structure [28][29][30][31][32]. There are two main types of this way of compound transformation: hashed fingerprints and key-based fingerprints and each type of compounds translation is connected with losing some pieces of information about compound structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, in order to apply ML methods for dealing with cheminformatic problems, the structures of chemical compounds need to be properly represented. One of the most popular approaches to this task is fingerprinting that is translating a compound into the form of a bit string coding information about its structure [28][29][30][31][32]. There are two main types of this way of compound transformation: hashed fingerprints and key-based fingerprints and each type of compounds translation is connected with losing some pieces of information about compound structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%