2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-009-1185-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing sensory panel performance in a proficiency test using the PanelCheck software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessor performance was evaluated using PanelCheck (Version V1.4.0, Nofima, Tromsø, Norway) according to the workflow described by Tomic et al (2010). For the statistical analysis of the data, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to investigate differences between treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessor performance was evaluated using PanelCheck (Version V1.4.0, Nofima, Tromsø, Norway) according to the workflow described by Tomic et al (2010). For the statistical analysis of the data, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to investigate differences between treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel performance was assessed using the workflow suggested by Tomic et al (2010). Repeatability (p*MSE plots and F-plots), discriminability and panel consensus (Tucker-1) were tested using PanelCheck 1.4 (Nofima Mat, Tromsø, Norway).…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scoring was done using a nine‐point hedonic scale ranging from 1 “dislike extremely” to 9 “like extremely.” Attributes with statistically significant scores were taken for further analysis as described by Tomic et al. (2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%