1995
DOI: 10.1139/f95-038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing differences between two age determination methods by tests of symmetry

Abstract: A common problem in fisheries science is the comparison of two methods for obtaining ages of individual animals. Often, indices of precision are computed for this purpose. We believe such indices are inappropriate both as measures of precision and for comparative purposes because they do not properly account for age effects or take the experimental design into consideration. We suggest that if the overall level of agreement is low between two ageing methods used on the same sample of fish, then one can use a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
86
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…lapillus from Interpreter A vs sagitta from Interpreter B; sagitta from Interpreter A vs lapillus from Interpreter B). For each combination, an age-bias plot [19] was generated and a test of symmetry [20] computed from the corresponding age-agreement table (not shown). In this table, the main diagonal represents the frequency of fish for which the same number of micro-increments is obtained based on the two structures and/or interpreters, whereas each cell off the main diagonal represents a difference in the number of micro-increments between the two structures and/or interpreters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lapillus from Interpreter A vs sagitta from Interpreter B; sagitta from Interpreter A vs lapillus from Interpreter B). For each combination, an age-bias plot [19] was generated and a test of symmetry [20] computed from the corresponding age-agreement table (not shown). In this table, the main diagonal represents the frequency of fish for which the same number of micro-increments is obtained based on the two structures and/or interpreters, whereas each cell off the main diagonal represents a difference in the number of micro-increments between the two structures and/or interpreters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average percentage error (APE) (Beamish and Fournier 1981), the coefficient of variation (CV) (Chang 1982), and the index of precision (D) (Chang 1982) were used to compare age readings between readers. Bias evaluation was based on age bias plots (Campana et al 1995) which allow visualizing deviation of the age readings from the 1 : 1 equivalence line, and systematic differences on the ages assigned between readers were investigated with the Bowker-type test for symmetry (Hoenig et al 1995). As good agreement between readers was achieved, the remaining otoliths were read twice by the first author.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bias and precision of annulus counts were analysed by statistical and graphical methods for each pair of replicate counts from the three interpreters. Accordingly, an age bias plot (Campana et al, 1995) was generated and a test of symmetry (Hoenig et al, 1995) computed from the corresponding age-agreement table. In this table, the main diagonal represents the frequency of fish for which the same estimated age is obtained by any combination of two interpreters, whereas each cell off the main diagonal represents a difference in estimated age between the interpreters.…”
Section: > Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%