2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2010.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of the effect of seismic behavior of shallow tunnels in liquefiable grounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Figure 6a and Figure 6b, it can be seen that, as the amplitude of the IM increases from 0.1 g to 0.5 g, the surface heave increases from 0.011 m to 0.105 m. The increase in the amplitude of IM results in a greater tunnel uplift as compared to the surface heave, which is minimal at the lower amplitudes but more pronounced at the higher amplitudes. This trend also follows a similar pattern as obtained by Azadi and Hosseini [8].…”
Section: Effect Of the Variation In The Amplitude Of The Input Motionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From Figure 6a and Figure 6b, it can be seen that, as the amplitude of the IM increases from 0.1 g to 0.5 g, the surface heave increases from 0.011 m to 0.105 m. The increase in the amplitude of IM results in a greater tunnel uplift as compared to the surface heave, which is minimal at the lower amplitudes but more pronounced at the higher amplitudes. This trend also follows a similar pattern as obtained by Azadi and Hosseini [8].…”
Section: Effect Of the Variation In The Amplitude Of The Input Motionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It also results in the reduced surface heave with increased resistance to seismic-induced bending moments, which can be seen in Figure 4a-d. The results show a similar trend obtained in the reference study [16] and by Azadi and Hosseini [8]. From the figures, it is evident that the tunnel complex with thicker lining has greater resistance to the seismic-induced uplift, distortions, and bending moments.…”
Section: Effect Of the Variation In Lining Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the numerical simulation has been gradually favored and applied by scholars in the study of tunnel vibration response analysis. After the Wenchuan earthquake, the vibration response of tunnel portal and shallow tunnels under earthquake vibration [4,5] , analysis of Shallow Excavation Tunnel in alluvium under lateral seismic loading [6] , the influence of liquefiable site, depth and section on aseismic performance of shallow tunnels [7,8] and others are all studied in detail based on the finite difference method. Based on finite difference software named FLAC/FLAC 3D, Huang et al [9] studied the dynamic time-history response of a shallow bias tunnel under horizontal seismic action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%