2022
DOI: 10.47065/bits.v4i1.1581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisis Sentimen Opini Masyarakat Terhadap Vaksinasi Booster COVID-19 Dengan Perbandingan Metode Naive Bayes, Decision Tree dan SVM

Abstract: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is very broad, especially in Indonesia. In early 2022, Indonesia entered the early stages of recovering conditions caused by the pandemic. The government has an option for the community to carry out a third dose of vaccination (booster). However, there are a number of pros and cons in the community regarding the booster vaccine. This study aims to conduct sentiment analysis related to public opinion on the COVID-19 booster vaccination in Indonesia with Naive Bayes model. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
7

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The same research was also done by Kristiyanti et al (2018) who conducted research on the topic of comparing the Naïve Bayes and SVM algorithms for sentiment analysis of candidates for governor of West Java, the results of this study Naïve Bayes algorithm obtained 94% accuracy as the best accuracy [20]. Other research was also conducted by Aldisa and Maulana (2022) with the topic of comparing the Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree and SVM algorithms for analyzing the sentiment of the Indonesian people towards the Covid-19 booster vaccination, the results of the Naïve Bayes algorithm were superior to the Decision Tree and SVM algorithms with 83.81% accuracy [21]. The latest research was conducted by Undamayanti et al (2022) with the topic of applying the Naïve Bayes algorithm with Particle Swarm Optimization optimizer for analyzing student sentiment towards the MBKM program, the results of the Naïve Bayes algorithm modeling PSO optimization obtained an accuracy of 71.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The same research was also done by Kristiyanti et al (2018) who conducted research on the topic of comparing the Naïve Bayes and SVM algorithms for sentiment analysis of candidates for governor of West Java, the results of this study Naïve Bayes algorithm obtained 94% accuracy as the best accuracy [20]. Other research was also conducted by Aldisa and Maulana (2022) with the topic of comparing the Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree and SVM algorithms for analyzing the sentiment of the Indonesian people towards the Covid-19 booster vaccination, the results of the Naïve Bayes algorithm were superior to the Decision Tree and SVM algorithms with 83.81% accuracy [21]. The latest research was conducted by Undamayanti et al (2022) with the topic of applying the Naïve Bayes algorithm with Particle Swarm Optimization optimizer for analyzing student sentiment towards the MBKM program, the results of the Naïve Bayes algorithm modeling PSO optimization obtained an accuracy of 71.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Tahapan dalam proses perhitungan klasifikasi kelas pada data uji dimulai dari perhitungan nilai prior probability, conditional probability, dan posterior probability. Berikut disajikan tahap perhitungan metode Naïve Bayes Classifier terhadap data uji tersebut [17]…”
Section: Klasifikasi Naïve Bayes Classifierunclassified
“…Naive Bayes juga diyakini merupakan metode untuk melakukan pemisahan data terstruktur yang lebih unggul daripada metode pemisahan data terstruktur lainnya dalam hal akurasi dan komputasi [15]. Pada penelitian oleh Aldisa dan Maulana membandingkan antara algoritma Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, dan SVM menunjukkan bahwa presisi Naive Bayes menempati urutan terbaik [16]. Penelitian lain yang dilakukan oleh Hasan dan Dwijayanti menunjukkan bahwa akurasi dari algoritma Naive Bayes sangat baik yaitu 92,5% [15].…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan 31 Pembahasanunclassified