Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Phase wise, application of both whole (mean 0.99%) and solid digestates (mean 0.97%) led to higher accumulation of SOC due to addition of recalcitrant un-degraded fractions present in these phases. This finding corroborated with the findings of Muscolo et al [23], who demonstrated an increase in SOC after application of solid digestate. SOC of soils treated with all the liquid (mean 0.90%) and ash digestates (mean 0.91%) was found to be statistically at par with control due the lower TOC content of the added by-products.…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon and Nutrient Content (Available N Availsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Phase wise, application of both whole (mean 0.99%) and solid digestates (mean 0.97%) led to higher accumulation of SOC due to addition of recalcitrant un-degraded fractions present in these phases. This finding corroborated with the findings of Muscolo et al [23], who demonstrated an increase in SOC after application of solid digestate. SOC of soils treated with all the liquid (mean 0.90%) and ash digestates (mean 0.91%) was found to be statistically at par with control due the lower TOC content of the added by-products.…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon and Nutrient Content (Available N Availsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding corroborated with the findings of Muscolo et al . , who demonstrated an increase in SOC after application of solid digestate. SOC of soils treated with all the liquid (mean 0.90%) and ash digestates (mean 0.91%) was found to be statistically at par with control due the lower TOC content of the added by‐products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molinuevo-Salces et al (2013) indicated that AcoD of SM with vegetable processing residues increases methane production by 219%, while De Vries et al (2012) the AcoD of SM with fruits and vegetable wastes (FVW) (skin, seeds and slurry from fruit washing) can increase bioenergy production by 568%. Furthermore, Muscolo et al (2017) confirmed that the agronomic properties improved (organic matter, nutrient balance) in the soils where digestates were applied coming from the AcoD of the mixture of SM, olive waste and citrus pulp compared with chemical fertilizers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…La calidad del digestato depende fuertemente del tipo de sustrato, los pretratamientos y la codigestión [49]; esta última genera un incremento en el contenido de materia orgánica y balancea los nutrientes, de modo que produce efectos en los suelos como mejoras en el almacenamiento de nutrientes, capacidad de retención de humedad y estímulo de la actividad microbiana [50].…”
Section: Potencial Del Uso Del Digestato Y Subproductos Derivadosunclassified