1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02562676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of robust Bayesian analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
303
1
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 493 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
303
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is deeply connected with robust Bayesian estimation concepts, e.g. see Berger (1980Berger ( , 1994.…”
Section: Regularized Least Squares and James-stein Estimators ⋆mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is deeply connected with robust Bayesian estimation concepts, e.g. see Berger (1980Berger ( , 1994.…”
Section: Regularized Least Squares and James-stein Estimators ⋆mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, when π(θ) is in G U S it seems that alternative values of θ (to θ 0 ) are not favored according to the point null hypothesis being studied. Some other justifications for using this class of priors can be found in Berger (1994), Casella and Berger (1987), Berger and Sellke (1987) and Gómez-Villegas and Sanz (1998).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact there are two distinct approaches of this kind, which have been compared by Walley [2]. The first approach, known as Bayesian sensitivity analysis or Bayesian robustness [3,4], assumes that there is an ideal prior distribution π 0 which could, ideally, model prior uncertainty. It is assumed that we are unable to determine π 0 accurately because of limited time or resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%