Attachment in Intellectual and Developmental Disability 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118938119.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Attachment Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups could have several explanations. Given that development of “goal- corrected partnerships” in caregiving dyads emerge in line with language acquisition and theory of mind development (Fletcher and Gallichan, 2016), it is possible that developmental delays impact upon the successful creation and maintenance of such partnerships when a child has IDs. Both Rutgers et al (2004) and Van Ijzendoorn et al (2007) suggested a similar explanation for their findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups could have several explanations. Given that development of “goal- corrected partnerships” in caregiving dyads emerge in line with language acquisition and theory of mind development (Fletcher and Gallichan, 2016), it is possible that developmental delays impact upon the successful creation and maintenance of such partnerships when a child has IDs. Both Rutgers et al (2004) and Van Ijzendoorn et al (2007) suggested a similar explanation for their findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible mechanisms for these findings have been proposed, such as the effect of the developmental differences that may complicate the development of synchronous interactions with caregivers in infancy (supported by Van IJzendoorn et al ’s, 2007 findings of reduced involvement in interactions despite parental sensitivity) or the unresolved feelings parents may have about their child’s IDs, ultimately affecting their caregiving (Schuengel et al , 2013; Fletcher and Gallichan, 2016). This population is also at greater risk of exposure to abuse and trauma (Spencer et al , 2005; McDonnell et al , 2019; Fang et al , 2022), factors that are well understood to be linked to insecure and disorganised patterns of attachment in the typically developing population (Lyons-Ruth and Jacobvitz, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review found that increasing insights into attachment behaviours and relationships showed the most promise for practical applications of attachment theory in people with ID (Schuengel et al, 2013); therefore, more education may help people to understand relationships and behaviours, which are considered challenging. While children in the general population need less physical protection and closeness as they grow older, some people with ID may lack the skills in theory of mind necessary to develop internal working models of attachment, and therefore continue to need physical proximity in order to feel safe and secure (Fletcher and Gallichan, 2016). Awareness of these aspects of attachment theory may help family and staff to more accurately interpret attachment behaviours, such as crying or clinging (Skelly, 2016), helping them to develop appropriate ways to respond and improving the attunement to people's needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is possible that parental grief and feelings of loss for the imagined 'healthy child' could impact on parental attunement early in a child's life (Fletcher, 2016) and lead to parents feeling they have failed to protect their child. RAD is thought to be associated with maltreatment early in life, and people with ID are more likely to experience institutionalization (Green and Goldwyn, 2002), poor care and early abuse (Fletcher and Gallichan, 2016) than those in the general population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When trying to find attachment instruments, the majority were qualitative, however this is a quantitative instrument. Also, this was the only quantitative instrument with SPSS coding instructions for including the fourth attachment category (dismissive/disorganized), which is often found in children who have experienced maltreatment, necessitating out‐of‐home placement (Fletcher & Gallichan, 2016; Main & Solomon, 1990; Miranda et al, 2019). Lastly, the AAS is valid and reliable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%