2018
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2017.2775179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview and Comparison of Online Implementable SOC Estimation Methods for Lithium-Ion Battery

Abstract: With the popularity of Electrical Vehicles (EVs), Lithium-ion battery industry is developing rapidly. To ensure the battery safe usage and to reduce its average lifecycle cost, an accurate State of Charge (SOC) tracking algorithms for real-time implementation are required for different applications. Many SOC estimation methods have been proposed in the literature. However, only a few of them consider the real-time applicability. This paper classifies the recently proposed online SOC estimation methods into fiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the SoC of cells can be estimated with OCV(SoC)-based method [29,30], with power electronics such as online EIS measurement [31,32], model-based-estimation and machine learning algorithms, and Ah(Coulomb)-counting, as it thoughtfully discussed in previous studies [33][34][35][36]. Challenges with certain chemistries can rise, as for LFP's low ∆OCV/∆SoC at the slow dynamic area and its hysteresis effect makes OCV (SoC)-based methods not optimal [37,38], whereas EIS-based measurements lack accuracy through ageing and the estimations are highly influenced from chemistry and experimental conditions [39]. Also, due to overload on computational complexity and memory storage or lack of accuracy, most implementation are to not suitable for on-board applications.…”
Section: In Discrete-time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the SoC of cells can be estimated with OCV(SoC)-based method [29,30], with power electronics such as online EIS measurement [31,32], model-based-estimation and machine learning algorithms, and Ah(Coulomb)-counting, as it thoughtfully discussed in previous studies [33][34][35][36]. Challenges with certain chemistries can rise, as for LFP's low ∆OCV/∆SoC at the slow dynamic area and its hysteresis effect makes OCV (SoC)-based methods not optimal [37,38], whereas EIS-based measurements lack accuracy through ageing and the estimations are highly influenced from chemistry and experimental conditions [39]. Also, due to overload on computational complexity and memory storage or lack of accuracy, most implementation are to not suitable for on-board applications.…”
Section: In Discrete-time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different methods for the state estimation have been proposed in the literature. Frequently-mentioned methods for SOC estimation are: ampere-hour counting, open-circuit voltage (OCV) based, model based, impedance based, static battery characteristics based, fuzzy logic and machine learning based estimations [8]. Each of these methods has its advantages and drawbacks, which makes them suitable for different battery technologies.…”
Section: State-of-charge and State-of-health Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example for an LiFePO4 battery cell, the dependency on SOC is taking place at low frequencies while SOH is normally analyzed at around few kilohertz where the impedance imaginary part is zero [1], [2]. Batteries are widely modeled by an equivalent-circuit-model (ECM) often regarded as Randles' model which is often used in SOC and SOH estimation algorithms [1], [3], [4]. Parameters of the ECM can be derived from the data of the complex impedance plot.…”
Section: Internal Impedance Of the Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%