2020
DOI: 10.1051/ro/2019052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An optimistic-pessimistic DEA model based on game cross efficiency approach

Abstract: The ranking of the decision making units (DMUs) is an essential problem in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Numerous approaches have been proposed for fully ranking of units. Majority of these methods consider DMUs with optimistic approach, whereas their weaknesses are ignored. In this study, for fully ranking of the units, a modified optimistic–pessimistic approach, which is based on game cross efficiency idea is proposed. The proposed game like iterative optimistic-pessimistic DEA procedure calculates the ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e production points located on the track were the most efficient input-output combination and their efficiency value was 1. With full technical efficiency, namely, with the least input or the maximum output under the given input, the efficiency value and projection value of different DMU were calculated by using the relationship between the actual observed value of DMU and the position of the efficiency frontier [16]. e main data model of DEA method is as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e production points located on the track were the most efficient input-output combination and their efficiency value was 1. With full technical efficiency, namely, with the least input or the maximum output under the given input, the efficiency value and projection value of different DMU were calculated by using the relationship between the actual observed value of DMU and the position of the efficiency frontier [16]. e main data model of DEA method is as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this problem, Doyle and Green (1994) proposed to build one secondary goal (SG) model, which could not only obtain unique final efficiency for all DMUs but also contribute to the theoretical research of the DEA method. The SG model can be constructed from multiple perspectives, including benevolent/aggressive (Doyle and Green, 1994; Wu et al , 2016a, 2016b and Chen and Wang, 2020), neutral (Wang and Chin, 2010; Ramón et al , 2011 and Shi et al , 2021) and other strategies (Wu et al , 2016a, 2016b, Örkcü et al , 2020 and Li et al , 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data of input variables and output variables can be proportional or non-proportional. In the DEA method, there is no need to formulate weights for input variables and output variables, which avoids errors caused by human factors, and is more objective and fair [15]. DEA is applicable in many situations, and it has certain advantages in the analysis of situations with multiple input variables and multiple output variables, so it is widely used in many fields, such as government agencies, power industry, financial institutions, medical care, military , logistics and transportation and other fields, analyze the production and operation efficiency and resource use level of decision-making units to improve the organizational performance of multiple departments.…”
Section: Dea Model Based On Sbm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%