2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13091663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Optical and SAR Based Fusion Approach for Mapping Surface Water Dynamics over Mainland China

Abstract: Earth Observation (EO) data is a critical information source for mapping and monitoring water resources over large inaccessible regions where hydrological in-situ networks are sparse. In this paper, we present a simple yet robust method for fusing optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data for mapping surface water dynamics over mainland China. This method uses a multivariate logistic regression model to estimate monthly surface water extent over a four-year period (2017 to 2020) from the combined usages … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sentinel missions as Sentinel-1/-3 can deliver useful data and produce valuable information such as RWSC and release. Our SAR-based classification for mapping surface water areas performs considerably better than Landsat-based maps [46], and this will make the estimation of reservoir area more robust and hence improve the accuracy of RWSC and release estimates. The findings indicate that the accuracy of RWSC estimates is more sensitive to satellite SWE while less sensitive to WSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sentinel missions as Sentinel-1/-3 can deliver useful data and produce valuable information such as RWSC and release. Our SAR-based classification for mapping surface water areas performs considerably better than Landsat-based maps [46], and this will make the estimation of reservoir area more robust and hence improve the accuracy of RWSC and release estimates. The findings indicate that the accuracy of RWSC estimates is more sensitive to satellite SWE while less sensitive to WSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both satellites carry a C-band SAR instrument which collects data in all-weather conditions enabling continuous 12 day repeat monitoring. The workflow was adapted from Druce et al [46] and consists of pre-processing, classification, and post-processing steps. In the pre-processing step, precise orbit vectors and range-Doppler terrain correction are applied to obtain a georeferenced SAR image.…”
Section: Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach for SWE mapping using satellite EO data is documented in [22]. The approach uses a multivariate logistic regression model to estimate surface water probability from a combination of optical imagery from the Sentinel-2 mission and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery from the Sentinel-1 mission.…”
Section: Surface Water Extent Mapping With Satellite Eomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach uses a multivariate logistic regression model to estimate surface water probability from a combination of optical imagery from the Sentinel-2 mission and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery from the Sentinel-1 mission. In the original approach by Druce et al [22], the input data are processed into monthly composites, but, specifically for Danish conditions, we modified the algorithm to output the results by individual sensor and acquisition date, thereby enabling the surface water extent products to correspond with the time of the flooding / drone activity. Optical data was prioritized where available due to the ability to identify smaller features than Sentinel-1.…”
Section: Surface Water Extent Mapping With Satellite Eomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite data assist in estimating crop water requirements and evaluating water use efficiency for irrigation management. Furthermore, Sentinel images and GEE aid in assessing land use changes within watersheds, contributing to effective watershed management and long‐term groundwater monitoring (Amani et al, 2020; Druce et al, 2021). Moreover, it was an efficient tool for mapping all conserved land sites across Nebraska and detecting changes in surface water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%