1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb12941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An operational model of pharmacological agonism: the effect of E/[A] curve shape on agonist dissociation constant estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
196
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(21 reference statements)
10
196
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 'Hill slopes' quoted in Figure 1 are necessarily approximate because, for n = 1, the E/[A] curve is not a logistic function (Black et al, 1985). The deviation from a logistic function is small, however, so it may reasonably be assumed that the gradient of the midpoint on the E/[A] curve is equal to the midpoint gradient of the logistic function best describing the E/[A] curve.…”
Section: Hill Slopes Of Agonist E/[a] Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 'Hill slopes' quoted in Figure 1 are necessarily approximate because, for n = 1, the E/[A] curve is not a logistic function (Black et al, 1985). The deviation from a logistic function is small, however, so it may reasonably be assumed that the gradient of the midpoint on the E/[A] curve is equal to the midpoint gradient of the logistic function best describing the E/[A] curve.…”
Section: Hill Slopes Of Agonist E/[a] Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When t is large, Hill slope z n, but when T is small the Hill slope tends towards 1 (Black et al, 1985) so, for a given Hill slope, n;k Hill slope when T is big, and n increasingly deviates from 1 as T becomes smaller. The size of the deviation of the Cheng-Prusoff estimate as [A] -* 0 depends only on n and is independent of t (17), and it increases as n deviates from 1.…”
Section: Hill Slopes Of Agonist E/[a] Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the values for both doseresponse curves (before and after block) obtained with a full agonist may be used to calculate the common values of M, Kd and P as well as the individual value of T for each curve. This procedure (referred to as 'B2') was followed by Black et al (1985) and in the later part of this work the experimental data have been analysed in both ways, as well as by the null method. As can be seen in Figure 1 there is usually little difference between the fit obtained with 'BI' and 'B2'.…”
Section: Guinea-pig Isolated Ileummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the 'operational' model (Black & Leff, 1983) it is possible to write an equation relating response to dose for the two curves (see below). From a comparison of estimates of the affinity of 5-hydroxytryptamine for receptors on rabbit aorta calculated by the 'operational model' and the 'null method ', Black et al (1985) concluded that 'the model provided an estimate of KA which was not significantly different from the estimate obtained using Furchgott's null method'. But although the mean estimates of log K were very similar (6.95 and 6.81), the value obtained by the null method was lower in each of the 9 pairs of estimates reported, which suggested a systematic difference (1 in 29 gives P < 0.002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%