2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09096.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An open pilot study of ambulatory photodynamic therapy using a wearable low-irradiance organic light-emitting diode light source in the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer

Abstract: Pain and inconvenience are practical barriers to the use of conventional PDT. This pilot study suggests that OLED-PDT is less painful than conventional PDT with the added advantage of being lightweight, and therefore has the potential for more convenient 'home PDT'. These results need to be validated in larger studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
99
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…84,85 A recent open study of ambulatory PDT in NMSC included 30 patients with SCC in situ, with an overall 84% lesion response reported at 1 year (including 10 SCCs in situ with followup). 86 Red narrowband LED light is used most often; however, a square wave intense pulsed light, with reduced dose variability, cleared all nine SCCs in situ in one case series, with all lesions remaining clear after a follow-up period of 4 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84,85 A recent open study of ambulatory PDT in NMSC included 30 patients with SCC in situ, with an overall 84% lesion response reported at 1 year (including 10 SCCs in situ with followup). 86 Red narrowband LED light is used most often; however, a square wave intense pulsed light, with reduced dose variability, cleared all nine SCCs in situ in one case series, with all lesions remaining clear after a follow-up period of 4 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a few reports using conventional OLEDs in close contact with biological matter [181]. OLED are mostly used as wearable light sources [182][183][184] and have not been implanted into tissue. Therefore, there is a need for completely biocompatible and possibly biodegradable LEDs: bio-OLEDs.…”
Section: Biomaterials Based Ledsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, LEDs do not emit the same light dose over the entire treatment area and do not adapt to the irregularities of the body [13,18]. Another disadvantage of this method is pain due to the dose of pure light that effective treatment with LED panels [19,20]. Indeed, if the light output was less, we could limit the pain caused by the PDT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%