2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ontology-based approach for the reconstruction and analysis of digital incidents timelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the paper [14], the authors stated that digital forensics investigators face a challenge such as the high volume of data, which are becoming continuously vast and diverse because of the growth of new technologies. Therefore, the interpretation of digital evidence and the reconstruction of events is a complicated and time-consuming task for the investigator.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper [14], the authors stated that digital forensics investigators face a challenge such as the high volume of data, which are becoming continuously vast and diverse because of the growth of new technologies. Therefore, the interpretation of digital evidence and the reconstruction of events is a complicated and time-consuming task for the investigator.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental aspect of cyber-investigations is the extraction and analysis of traces, where the definition of a trace is any observable modification, including an absence of expected data, caused by an event in a digital crime scene (Casey, 2013). In the context of cyber-investigations, traces are used to address questions, which are generally described what, where, when, who, how and why.…”
Section: Case Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las propuestas de (Rueda-rueda, Rico-bautista, & Guerrero, 2018) y de (Di Ioro et al, 2017) se tuvieron en cuenta para definir el método más adecuado para el análisis forense de correos electrónicos. Los criterios de calidad para que las herramientas forenses permitan la reconstrucción de la prueba digital, bajo cánones de reproducibilidad, integridad y credibilidad propuestos por (Chabot, Bertaux, Nicolle, & Kechadi, 2015) y los criterios de evaluación de herramientas propuestos por (David, Parra, Rico-bautista, Medina-cárdenas, & Sanchez-ortiz, 2018) resultaron de interés para aplicar a la herramienta de soporte aquí presentada. El trabajo (Chhabra & Bajwa, 2012) que revisa integralmente el tema del análisis forense de correos electrónicos, se tomó como estructura formal para la descripción ordenada del objeto de estudio, mientras que los trabajos (Devendran, Shahriar, & Clincy, 2015) y (Youn, 2014) permitieron ajustar la ontología al modelo requerido para representar la trazabilidad y las preguntas de competencia.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified