2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/13012.6205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Invitro Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Antibacterial Activity of Conventional GIC and Hydroxyapatite Reinforced GIC in Different Storage Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a review study by Yip et al a range of 130-230 MPa was reported [34]. Bali et al [35] reported the value of 112 MPa, which is very similar to the findings of our study with regard to the compressive strength of the GIC material. The results discussed previously showed that adding gelatine and chondroitin sulphate to GIC reduced the compressive strength significantly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a review study by Yip et al a range of 130-230 MPa was reported [34]. Bali et al [35] reported the value of 112 MPa, which is very similar to the findings of our study with regard to the compressive strength of the GIC material. The results discussed previously showed that adding gelatine and chondroitin sulphate to GIC reduced the compressive strength significantly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The intermediate layer is very resistant to acid and is difficult to break. Therefore, the addition of HA into GIC enhance the mechanical strength of the resulting GIC [ 23 , 30 , 31 ]. Figure 6 explained the schematic diagram of setting reaction of HA added GIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) This is in contrast to a study performed by Bali et al, in which the authors claimed that there was no significant relationship between the type of storage media and a change in the compressive strength of Fuji IX. (9) The current study used deionized water for storage in the incubator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) As aging can have a profound effect on the compressive strength of glass ionomers, it is imperative to study its effect on the compressive strength of novel glass ionomers. (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) Although the physical properties of modern glass ionomers have been extensively reported, few studies have examined how these parameters change with age. (13) This study aimed to assess the effect of aging on the compressive strength of two glass ionomer restorative materials with a composite resin as a control.…”
Section: Original Article Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%