2016
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Intercomparison of Dissolved Iron Speciation at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) Site: Results from GEOTRACES Crossover Station A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH at which the SA method was applied (8.4) was higher than the pH of 8.05 used in the TAC method but was necessary to avoid peak interferences and low sensitivity. This obviously has consequences, as also described by Buck et al (, ). They compared both methods using pH of 8 and 8.05, respectively, for the TAC method and a pH of 8.2 for the SA method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The pH at which the SA method was applied (8.4) was higher than the pH of 8.05 used in the TAC method but was necessary to avoid peak interferences and low sensitivity. This obviously has consequences, as also described by Buck et al (, ). They compared both methods using pH of 8 and 8.05, respectively, for the TAC method and a pH of 8.2 for the SA method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Because the Mediterranean Sea is surrounded by continents and the main Mediterranean rivers are located in the Western Basin, HS could play an important role in the complexation of DFe in this basin. Based on the relatively low conditional stability constants (10.6 ± 0.2 ≤ log K ' FeHS ≤ 11.1 ± 0.2) of humic‐type ligands for iron complexation determined by Laglera and van den Berg () using SRFA and SRHA as model, humics are generally considered as a weaker class of ligands (L 2 ) than siderophores (L 1 , log K ′ FeL1 > 12; Buck et al, ; Rijkenberg et al, ). Then humics, assumed to be relatively weak, become important for the biogeochemical cycle of Fe when the relatively stronger ligands are saturated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolved Fe(II) can be determined by flow injection analysis with in-line preconcentration and chemiluminescence detection. DFe can be determined by flow injection analysis with in-line preconcentration on chelating resin followed by analysis using colorimetric technique or IC-PMS (Biller and Bruland, 2012;Rijkenberg et al, 2014;Sedwick et al, 2015;Buck et al, 2016;Wuttig et al, 2019).…”
Section: Standardization Of Aerosol Fe Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%