2019
DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2019.1655351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Methodology Using PROMETHEE and Kano’s Model to Rank Strategic Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows the Kano Model, considering the relationship between the degree of satisfaction and the level of performance. The Kano Model is established by means of a questionnaire, where it is divided into two groups of questions: the group of functional or positive questions that seek to identify what consumer satisfaction is if a given attribute is present in a product/service and the group of dysfunctional or negative questions that seek to identify how much the non-existence of a given attribute or its poor performance interferes negatively with consumer satisfaction (Fofan et al, 2019;Asian et al, 2019). By comparing these results, it is possible to classify the attributes as Attractive, Must-be, One-dimensional, Reverse and Indifferent.…”
Section: Kano Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 shows the Kano Model, considering the relationship between the degree of satisfaction and the level of performance. The Kano Model is established by means of a questionnaire, where it is divided into two groups of questions: the group of functional or positive questions that seek to identify what consumer satisfaction is if a given attribute is present in a product/service and the group of dysfunctional or negative questions that seek to identify how much the non-existence of a given attribute or its poor performance interferes negatively with consumer satisfaction (Fofan et al, 2019;Asian et al, 2019). By comparing these results, it is possible to classify the attributes as Attractive, Must-be, One-dimensional, Reverse and Indifferent.…”
Section: Kano Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the Attractive and Mandatory Quality Model seeks to recognize the demands of consumers, making a behavioral description for each attribute through its classification (Shahin and Mohammadi, 2015; Fofan et al , 2019). Figure 1 shows the Kano Model, considering the relationship between the degree of satisfaction and the level of performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its introduction, fuzzy logic has been widely used in academic works in several areas besides engineering, such as in the quality area, for example, in the works (Medeiros, 2009); (Ramasamy and Selladurai, 2004) and (Aquino et al, 2019); (Fofan et al, 2019) and in assisting investment decision makers, for example, in the works of (Eraslan and Iç, 2011); (Zandi and Tavana, 2011); (Zou et al, 2020), (Díaz and Nojima, 2020) and (Suh and Kim, 2020).…”
Section: The Fuzzy Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O Modelo de Kano é utilizado para analisar a importância de atributos que envolve qualidade em serviços e a qualidade em produtos (MADZIK, 2018), com base na relação entre o desempenho ou a existência de um atributo e a satisfação dos usuários (KANO et al, 1984;REICHENBACH et al, 2021). Esse modelo tem sido amplamente utilizado para classificar os desejos e as necessidades dos clientes (FOFAN et al, 2019;BAIER et al, 2020;TANG et al, 2021).…”
Section: Modelo De Kanounclassified