2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmse.2021.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An information fusion FMEA method to assess the risk of healthcare waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review of the existing literature indicates that most scholars used the MCGDM approach for the assessment of MW management ( Baghapour et al, 2018 , Ouyang et al, 2021 ), MW treatment alternatives ( Manupati et al, 2021 , Shi et al, 2017 ) and the location of MW disposal sites (Tirkolaee et al, 2020). At present, there is a lack of effective reverse supply chain design for MW during pandemics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This review of the existing literature indicates that most scholars used the MCGDM approach for the assessment of MW management ( Baghapour et al, 2018 , Ouyang et al, 2021 ), MW treatment alternatives ( Manupati et al, 2021 , Shi et al, 2017 ) and the location of MW disposal sites (Tirkolaee et al, 2020). At present, there is a lack of effective reverse supply chain design for MW during pandemics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the issue of MW management has been explored by a great number of scholars, and many MCGDM methods have been introduced into this research area. However, most of the MCGDM methods proposed by the above scholars are used to address the assessment of MW management ( Baghapour et al, 2018 , Ouyang et al, 2021 ) and disposal alternatives ( Manupati et al, 2021 , Shi et al, 2017 ). Through the literature review, we found that there are still relatively few MCGDM articles on the evaluation of MW recycling channels and the existing relative literature still has some limitations: (1) The evaluation index system of CMW recycling channels is not sound enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of mathematical rigour in the formulation of the RPN and its subjectivity in calculating the three parameters O, S and D, is studied with the Fusion FMEA method based on 2-tuple linguistic information and interval probability to analyse the failure modes taking into account heterogeneous information rather than single type information. (Ouyang et. Al 2021).…”
Section: State Of the Art And Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMEA is a proactive reliability‐management tool used to define, track, and reduce potential issues 3,4 . Due to its powerful adaptability and effectiveness, FMEA has been frequently adopted in many fields, for example, aerospace, healthcare, and manufacturing 5–7 . The major steps can be restated as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Due to its powerful adaptability and effectiveness, FMEA has been frequently adopted in many fields, for example, aerospace, healthcare, and manufacturing. [5][6][7] The major steps can be restated as follows. First, the evaluation information of failure modes with regard to the risk factors (RFs): occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D) are given by experts using a numeric range between 1 and 10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%