2018
DOI: 10.1002/2018rs006536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Indoor Path Loss Prediction Model Using Wall Correction Factors for Wireless Local Area Network and 5G Indoor Networks

Abstract: A modified indoor path loss prediction model is presented, namely, effective wall loss model. The modified model is compared to other indoor path loss prediction models using simulation data and real‐time measurements. Different operating frequencies and antenna polarizations are considered to verify the observations. In the simulation part, effective wall loss model shows the best performance among other models as it outperforms 2 times the dual‐slope model, which is the second best performance. Similar obser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…at is to say, the results of the 23rd and 27th sessions are used to predict the results of the 28th session, the 2400th session to predict the results of the 29th session, and the 25th session of the 29th session to predict the results of the 30th session so as to form the rotation training and repeat it until the full precision requirement of prediction is fulfilled [34,35]. And the achievement that satisfies the accuracy, namely, the forecast result that wants to obtain for the forecast is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Information Forward Propagation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at is to say, the results of the 23rd and 27th sessions are used to predict the results of the 28th session, the 2400th session to predict the results of the 29th session, and the 25th session of the 29th session to predict the results of the 30th session so as to form the rotation training and repeat it until the full precision requirement of prediction is fulfilled [34,35]. And the achievement that satisfies the accuracy, namely, the forecast result that wants to obtain for the forecast is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Information Forward Propagation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a cement wall, which is the most popular type of wall, shows significant differences in transmission and reflection properties for the 2.4 and 5.2 GHz frequencies [ 27 ]. Considering the influence of walls, Obeidat et al [ 28 ] presented the following effective wall loss model, which is consistent with practical indoor environments: where is the path-loss exponent, and is the attenuation caused by the v -th wall in the propagation path. Focusing on the fact that the wall attenuation differs for each frequency band, the NLOS mode can be estimated.…”
Section: Preliminarymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In [ 27 ], the propagation loss for a common building material in the 2.4 and 5.2 GHz bands was analyzed. In [ 28 ], the effects of walls on the propagation loss in complex indoor environments were analyzed, and an effective wall loss model was proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The path loss between the receiver and the transmitter can be calculated using deterministic models such as Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) [14], the One Slope Model (OSM) [15] or empirical models [16]. Furthermore, the Motley Keenan Model [17] can be used to evaluate the effects of the walls on the attenuation of signal strength. In our study, we applied the FSPL model to construct the fitness function of the genetic algorithm and simulated annealing.…”
Section: Software Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%