2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-014-9387-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Individualized Numeracy Curriculum for Children with Intellectual Disabilities: A Single Blind Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the single-case analysis, eight single-case studies were deemed high quality and 14 were adequate quality as shown in Table 1. Only three group-experimental studies were found (Browder, Trela, et al, 2012; Hall, Hustyi, Hammond, Hirt, & Reiss, 2014; Tzanakaki, Hastings, Grindle, Hughes, & Hoare, 2014) and all three were deemed high quality as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the single-case analysis, eight single-case studies were deemed high quality and 14 were adequate quality as shown in Table 1. Only three group-experimental studies were found (Browder, Trela, et al, 2012; Hall, Hustyi, Hammond, Hirt, & Reiss, 2014; Tzanakaki, Hastings, Grindle, Hughes, & Hoare, 2014) and all three were deemed high quality as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single group pre–post evaluation of TEN‐DD with six children with autism (Tzanakaki et al, 2014a) provided initial evidence of the feasibility of the TEN‐DD programme. Tzanakaki et al (2014b) later conducted a small randomised controlled trial in a special school in Wales that provided evidence of the potential efficacy of the model. Tzanakaki et al recruited 24 students with severe intellectual disability and/or autism and randomised them into two groups, one accessing TEN‐DD intervention and the other receiving mathematics teaching as usual.…”
Section: Teaching Early Numeracy To Children With Developmental Disabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All teachers and TAs working on TEN‐DD were given a folder with all the necessary information and a resource kit. Folders contained the TEN‐DD framework, a suggested session structure, the teaching plans, suggested response equivalents for minimally verbal students, a DTT information sheet, suggested entry (warm‐up) activities, a DTT data sheet (to collect individual data for up to three students; see Figure 1), a skills tracker (list of all targets covered in the programme to record introduction and mastery dates), a copy of a bespoke mentoring checklist (a task analysis of all steps that the teaching staff should do during one TEN‐DD session), and copies of two research papers conducted on the TEN‐DD programme (Tzanakaki et al, 2014a; Tzanakaki et al, 2014b). Each kit contained the resources necessary to implement the TEN‐DD programme (number lines 1–10; number cards 1–20; 30 double‐sided counters; red and green dot lines; domino cards 1–6; random array dot cards 1–4; and pair pattern dot cards) and some other items that could be used while targeting generalisation of acquired skills.…”
Section: Implementing the Ten‐dd Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 11 studies integrated either A, K or a combination of several teaching styles. Only five empirical studies in Appendix A implemented instructional strategies based on kinaesthetic learning: for example, (a) self and match, (b) hand technique and manipulation, (c) mathematical cognition, (d) mathematics recovery programme and (e) functional magnetic resonance imaging (Croce, 2015;Geary et al, 2012;Iuculano et al, 2014;Tzanakaki et al, 2014;Vitalo, 2017). Another three studies used instructional strategies based on auditory learning styles such as (a) mathematics instruction based on stories with systematic instruction; (b) metacognitive monitoring (one-on-one); and (c) storybooks (Brosnan et al, 2016;Green, 2014;Jimenez & Kemmery, 2013).…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%