1992
DOI: 10.1016/1042-9573(92)90002-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An incentive-based theory of bank regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An important paper on this subject is Campbell, Chan, and Marino [1992] wbich analyzes regulatory incentives to expend monitoring effort, given regulatory effort aversion. This paper shows that regulatory monitoring and capital requirements are partial substitutes in curbing bank asset risk.…”
Section: Bank Closure Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important paper on this subject is Campbell, Chan, and Marino [1992] wbich analyzes regulatory incentives to expend monitoring effort, given regulatory effort aversion. This paper shows that regulatory monitoring and capital requirements are partial substitutes in curbing bank asset risk.…”
Section: Bank Closure Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 An aspect absent from this literature is the interaction between regulators themselves because it usually assumes that both regulations are managed by a single agency or di®erent agencies acting in perfect synchrony. On the other hand, studies such as Campbell, Chan and Marino (1992), which analyzes supervisors' incentives to monitor banks, and Mailath and Mester (1994), which analyzes the DI's incentives to close banks, assume a single regulator. 12 Repullo (2000) considers the interaction between regulators by studying the optimal allocation of the lending of last resort function in an incomplete contract framework.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the end-of-period value of a generic investment in a loan or risky security, j i1 , i s g i v en by, 2 For example, see Chan, Greenbaum, and Thakor (1992), Giammarino, Lewis, and Sappington (1993), Kim and Santomero (1988a), John, John, and Senbet (1991), Campbell, Chan, and Marino (1992), and John, Saunders, and Senbet (1995). 3 Campbell, Chan, and Marino (1992) also suggest limitations on incentive-compatible approaches. As individual loans are discrete investments, a bank's loan investment opportunity set is dened to be the set of all possible combinations of the discrete lending opportunities it faces.…”
Section: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%