An In Vitro Study of Condylar Displacement Caused by Interocclusal Records: Influence of Recording Material, Storage Time, and Recording Technique

Ghazal, Muhamad; Hedderich, Jürgen; Kern, Matthias

doi:10.1111/jopr.12437

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies on the accuracy of CR interocclusal recording materials provided insight in responding to focus question 2. [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] Assif et al 42 measured changes in vertical dimension using an electromechanical device in a study on 20 patients with a double wafer of base wax, wafer of base wax coated with zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) paste, acrylic resin, and polyether (PE) interocclusal recording material. PE was the most accurate among the four materials with a vertical discrepancy of 20 to 30 micrometers.…”

Section: Focus Question 2: What Effect Do Different Recording Materiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When limited to SRs, RCT's and Meta‐Analysis, and Clinical Trials among all search terms, 127 articles were selected for further analysis. Studies on the accuracy of CR interocclusal recording materials provided insight in responding to focus question 2 42–59 …”

Section: Focus Question 2: What Effect Do Different Recording Materiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They reported that the PVS and PE materials had better accuracy and the wax materials introduced higher vertical discrepancies. Ghazal et al 54 in a follow‐up in vitro study evaluated the same materials from their previous study and added a composite resin material. PVS and PE materials performed better than the wax and composite resin materials with regards to condylar displacement.…”

Section: Focus Question 2: What Effect Do Different Recording Materiamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Kattadiyil

Alzaid

Campbell

2021

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to evaluate the existing literature relative to two focus questions: What are the techniques used and their reproducibility in recording centric relation (CR) in a dentate and partially dentate population and what effect do different recording materials have on the reproducibility of CR? Materials and Methods Keywords used in the initial search were: CR, interocclusal records, CR accuracy, CR reproducibility, and CR technique. The search was then limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, Meta‐analyses, and Clinical Trials. Results Initial search related to the selected search terms resulted in more than 3500 articles. When subsequent search was limited to Systematic Reviews, Randomized Controlled Studies, and Meta‐Analysis and Clinical Trials, this resulted in 291 articles selected for further analysis. Conclusions Techniques using chin point guidance, bimanual manipulation, power centric, Gothic arch tracing, leaf gauge, and anterior deprogramming devices to record CR can all be comparable in precision and clinical accuracy in regards to clinical relevance. Practitioner experience and familiarity with a particular technique is critical for accuracy when recording CR. Polyvinyl siloxane and polyether consistently performed better in the broad range of studies on recording materials. Virtual capture of CR could serve as a comparable recording medium but requires further clinical study.

show abstract

Section: Focus Question 2: What Effect Do Different Recording Materiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Focus Question 2: What Effect Do Different Recording Materiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Focus Question 2: What Effect Do Different Recording Materiamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Kattadiyil

Alzaid

Campbell

2021

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, limited evidence and consensus exists to drive such procedures. To clarify the impact of materials on registration procedures, Ghazal et al 224 evaluated articulator condylar element displacements related to various interocclusal recording materials, record storage time, and the interocclusal recording technique used on the condylar element displacements.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

Donovan

Marzola²,

Murphy³

et al. 2018

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2017, professional literature germane to the clinical practice of prosthodontics was published at an astounding rate. The annual content of over 50 professional journals was searched in its entirety to arrive at this review intended to provide readers with a general clinical update. For convenience, prosthodontics has been divided into 8 subtopics: general prosthodontic considerations, conventional removable complete prosthodontics, conventional removable partial prosthodontics, conventional fixed prosthodontics, general implant prosthodontic considerations, implant removable prosthodontics, implant-fixed prosthodontics, and prosthodontic materials. In addition to the articles selected for review, a sizable volume of excellent general reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and helpful clinical descriptive materials were also published on topics of prosthodontic interest. Although it would be impractical to provide detailed comments on this voluminous additional material, it is listed here for the reader's convenience: clinical processes, 1-7 anatomy and physiology, 8-20 biomechanics, 21 bruxism, 22-25 conventional complete dentures, 26-28 conventional fixed prosthodontics, 29-33 conventional removable partial prosthodontics, 34-36 diagnosis, 37-43 digital dentistry, 44-47

show abstract

A comparison of different methods and materials for establishing maximal intercuspal position: A clinical study

Bergh

Owen

Howes

2022

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An In Vitro Study of Condylar Displacement Caused by Interocclusal Records: Influence of Recording Material, Storage Time, and Recording Technique

Cited by 6 publications

References 16 publications

What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement

What Materials and Reproducible Techniques May Be Used in Recording Centric Relation? Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

A comparison of different methods and materials for establishing maximal intercuspal position: A clinical study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About