1989
DOI: 10.1016/0160-5402(89)90015-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved method to correct the QT interval of the electrocardiogram for changes in heart rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
156
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
156
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the HR of dogs is much higher than that found in humans and, hence, the correct QT values provided by such equations diverge greatly from the original QT intervals . In contrast, the simple linear equation proposed by Van de Water et al (1989) yielded more consistent results for high HR. Thus, QTcV had the lowest coefficient of variation and the less variability, compared with the others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the HR of dogs is much higher than that found in humans and, hence, the correct QT values provided by such equations diverge greatly from the original QT intervals . In contrast, the simple linear equation proposed by Van de Water et al (1989) yielded more consistent results for high HR. Thus, QTcV had the lowest coefficient of variation and the less variability, compared with the others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Results from the present study indicate that the method proposed by Van de Water et al (1989) for correcting QT intervals is the most appropriate for application to dogs in small clinical practice because of its simplicity and reliability. The routine application of such approach would certainly assist the correct evaluation of the QT interval in order to precisely infer about abnormalities of the ventricular repolarization which predispose to occurrence of arrhythmias that must be diagnosis as early as better.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations