2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved method for voice pathology detection by means of a HMM-based feature space transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were evaluated using Classification Error Rate (CER), Accuracy (Acc) and Cumulative Error (Arias-Londoño et al, 2010;Godino et al, 2005Godino et al, , 2006. For the training and validation steps, we used k-fold cross-validation with k = 10.…”
Section: Automatic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were evaluated using Classification Error Rate (CER), Accuracy (Acc) and Cumulative Error (Arias-Londoño et al, 2010;Godino et al, 2005Godino et al, , 2006. For the training and validation steps, we used k-fold cross-validation with k = 10.…”
Section: Automatic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated systems have been used to detect the presence of pathological voice, specifically vocal fold (i.e., laryngeal) disorders (Arias-Londoñ o et al, 2010;Fraile et al, 2009;Szaleniec et al, 2007;Wielgat et al, 2008), and assess the intelligibility of subjects with dysglossia and dysphonia to assist in rehabilitation (Maier et al, 2010). In these disorders, the speech production organs are affected, which results in atypicalities in the voice.…”
Section: Speech Technology Tools In Disordered Voice and Speech Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publications [16]- [20] utilized PdA (Príncipe de Asturias) database. Reference [16] used MFCC, Noise and energy features with HMM classifier to detect pathological speech giving accuracy of 82.14%.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [16] used MFCC, Noise and energy features with HMM classifier to detect pathological speech giving accuracy of 82.14%. SVM classifier with MFCC and modulation spectra based features giving accuracy of 81.70% is reported [17].…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%