1995
DOI: 10.1086/176492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Line-Strength Parameterization in Hot-Star Winds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
174
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
174
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerical tests showed that this phenomenon can be neglected for most considered levels (see also Lamers & Morton 1976). Moreover, there would not be any radiatively driven wind if the opposite is true since radiatively driven stellar wind is enabled by high transition rates P i j (Gayley 1995). On the other hand, at first sight it is not clear whether this assumption is also fulfilled in the case of strong wind-shocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, numerical tests showed that this phenomenon can be neglected for most considered levels (see also Lamers & Morton 1976). Moreover, there would not be any radiatively driven wind if the opposite is true since radiatively driven stellar wind is enabled by high transition rates P i j (Gayley 1995). On the other hand, at first sight it is not clear whether this assumption is also fulfilled in the case of strong wind-shocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, such a complicated situation cannot be adequately described by models with a temperatureindependent radiative force, or with a radiative force artificially depending on wind temperature via the thermal velocity as has been done, e.g., by KKII. Note that the artificial dependence on the thermal velocity may be removed using an alternative description of the radiative force by Gayley (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, is that the X-ray differential emission measure (DEM) is very sensitive to changes in the mass-loss rate, as parametrized via theQ introduced by Gayley (1995) to characterize the overall opacity available for line driving in the Castor, Abbott & Klein (1975) wind formalism. …”
Section: Rfhd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the notation follows Owocki (2004), and in particularQ is a measure of the total line opacity in the wind, in units of the electron scattering opacity κ e (see Gayley 1995). The term in parentheses is the reciprocal of the Sobolev optical depth; through the appearance of the spatial velocity gradient dv/dr, it represents the degree to which the wind is able to Doppler-shift the lines out of their own shadow.…”
Section: Line-driven Windsmentioning
confidence: 99%