2011
DOI: 10.3233/mas-2011-0163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved estimator of the finite population mean in simple random sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the efficiency of the estimators several authors have suggested combining ratio estimator with difference estimator in different ways. Some important references are Ray and Singh (1981), Singh et al (2008), Gupta and Shabbir (2008), Grover andKaur (2011) andSolanki (2012). Motivated by these authors we suggest some improved estimators combining ratio estimator with difference estimator as:…”
Section: Proposed Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the efficiency of the estimators several authors have suggested combining ratio estimator with difference estimator in different ways. Some important references are Ray and Singh (1981), Singh et al (2008), Gupta and Shabbir (2008), Grover andKaur (2011) andSolanki (2012). Motivated by these authors we suggest some improved estimators combining ratio estimator with difference estimator as:…”
Section: Proposed Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Recently, Shabbir and Gupta [11] used the linear combination of two auxiliary variables to propose a di erence cum exponential ratio-type estimator. This concept was initiated by Gupta and Shabbir [24] and Grover and Kaur [31]. y SG = q 6 y+q 7 X x +q 8 Z z exp X x X + x ; (19) where q 6 , q 7 , and q 8 are the feasible constants de ned in Box V.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works have built on both the modifications of the classical ratio or regression and the exponential ratio estimators to obtain improved efficiencies in simple random sampling. These works include [24], [10], [58], [31], [35], [35], [42], [6], [7], [8]. These works showed some improvements over the Regression estimator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%