2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-03794-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved epsilon constraint-handling method in MOEA/D for CMOPs with large infeasible regions

Abstract: This paper proposes an improved epsilon constraint-handling mechanism, and combines it with a decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA/D) to solve constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). The proposed constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (CMOEA) is named MOEA/D-IEpsilon. It adjusts the epsilon level dynamically according to the ratio of feasible to total solutions (RFS) in the current population. In order to evaluate the performance of MOEA/D-IEpsilon, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A specific decreasing scheme for the level is adopted, where exponential or polynomial (as in [24]) decrease can be used, depending on the feasibility ratio. Tested over a 14 functions benchmark earlier proposed by the same authors [25], the resulting PPS-MOEA/D outperforms some classical MOEAs quoted in this section but requires tuning many parameters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A specific decreasing scheme for the level is adopted, where exponential or polynomial (as in [24]) decrease can be used, depending on the feasibility ratio. Tested over a 14 functions benchmark earlier proposed by the same authors [25], the resulting PPS-MOEA/D outperforms some classical MOEAs quoted in this section but requires tuning many parameters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In [23], the authors allow increasing the level when the ratio of feasible solutions is greater than a threshold value, to promote exploration. This strategy, embedded in MOEA/D, is compared with MOEA/D-CDP [13] and with the original -constraint mechanism (decreasing pattern), over a set of nine constrained MOPs introduced earlier by the same authors [25]. Furthermore, this strategy is also compared with classical MOEAs (either dominance or decomposition-based) in a later work [26], over the CTP [17] and CF series [18], using IGD as a performance indicator.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the performance of the proposed MOEA/D-ACDP, 14 constrained multi-objective test problems with large infeasible regions in the objective space are used [27,28].…”
Section: Test Instances Lir-cmopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm ( -MOEA) -MOEA presented in 2003 by Dieb et al [7] is a steady-state algorithm, that is it updates the population one solution at a time and coevolves a population of individuals with an external archive, where are stored the best non dominated solutions. The external archive applies -dominance to prevent the deterioration of the population and to ensure both convergence and diversity of the solutions.…”
Section: Pareto Archived Evolutionary (Paes) Published In 2000 By Knomentioning
confidence: 99%