2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2007.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved auto-tuning scheme for PI controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SISO benchmark consists of concentration control in the isothermal Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) in which a van de Vusse reaction with non-minimum phase behavior takes place. This problem has been used by various researchers including (Mudi et al, 2008;Chang, et al, 2002;Hahn and Edgar, 2001;Edward and Spurgeon, 1998) to evaluate the performance of nonlinear control methods. The benchmark used to address MIMO systems is the concentration and temperature control of a nonisothermal van de Vusse reactor which has also been used to assess performance of nonlinear control methods (Guay et al, 2005).…”
Section: Stopping Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SISO benchmark consists of concentration control in the isothermal Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) in which a van de Vusse reaction with non-minimum phase behavior takes place. This problem has been used by various researchers including (Mudi et al, 2008;Chang, et al, 2002;Hahn and Edgar, 2001;Edward and Spurgeon, 1998) to evaluate the performance of nonlinear control methods. The benchmark used to address MIMO systems is the concentration and temperature control of a nonisothermal van de Vusse reactor which has also been used to assess performance of nonlinear control methods (Guay et al, 2005).…”
Section: Stopping Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methodologies are found to present quite satisfactory results for first-order processes, but they usually fail to provide acceptable performance for higher-order processes and especially for nonlinear ones due to large overshoots and poor regulation on loading (Hang et al, 1991;Mudi et al, 2008). In addition, it has been quite difficult to tune properly the PID parameters, during typical operation plant, due to difficulties related to production goals (Coelho & Pessoa, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of PID auto-tuning algorithms have been developed for linear first-or second-order models which are not always possible for practical processes [14]. This restriction to such simplified model classes will invariably result in severe process-model mismatches, implying that only conservative PID tuning rules can be employed [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%