2007
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer

Abstract: A feature selection method was used in an analysis of three major microarray expression datasets to identify molecular subclasses and prognostic markers in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, showing that it is a heterogeneous disease with at least four main subtypes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
400
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 447 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(91 reference statements)
42
400
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For ER-negative breast cancer, the expression levels of complement and immune response pathway genes have instead been shown to be more important for clinical outcome. 25 Even though our patient material is not equivalent to the patient material in the above-mentioned studies, it nevertheless suggests that a division of ER-positive disease can be achieved by merely analyzing one marker of proliferation, in line with another recent publication on Ki67. 22 Histological grade was not an independent prognostic factor in this study, not even in the subgroup of medically untreated patients, in which Ki67 was of independent prognostic value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For ER-negative breast cancer, the expression levels of complement and immune response pathway genes have instead been shown to be more important for clinical outcome. 25 Even though our patient material is not equivalent to the patient material in the above-mentioned studies, it nevertheless suggests that a division of ER-positive disease can be achieved by merely analyzing one marker of proliferation, in line with another recent publication on Ki67. 22 Histological grade was not an independent prognostic factor in this study, not even in the subgroup of medically untreated patients, in which Ki67 was of independent prognostic value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Recently, several groups have identified a subgroup of good prognosis ERÀ cancers, encompassing a subgroup of triple-negative and basal-like tumors, which is characterized by the expression of an immune response module. [125][126][127][128] This transcriptomic profile may prove helpful for the identification of patients with triple-negative and basal-like cancers that have a better outcome. In this context, the finding of higher expression of CT-X antigens (in particular MAGE and NY-ESO) in this subgroup opens up another potential avenue for therapy as vaccines against these antigens are already in clinical trial for lung cancer.…”
Section: Clinical Behavior Of Basal-like and Triple-negative Breast Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancer is not a single disease [38]: breast cancer prognosis varies with expression of key hormone receptors: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and her2/neu/ ERbB2 (Her2) [56] histologic grade [57], and presence of metastasis. Recent evidence suggests that the microenvironment in these tumors is different [58,59].…”
Section: Breast Cancer Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%