2010 11th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics &Amp; Vision 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icarcv.2010.5707842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exTS based neuro-fuzzy algorithm for prognostics and tool condition monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to find the probability of being at each state in future, the model must be unrolled over the time horizon while there are no observations available from onwards. Hence, prognosis for can also be formulated similar to diagnosis case in a probabilistic manner as follows: (16) where is again included to indicate that calculations are based on the parameter set of the trained HMM and is a normalizing factor replaced by similar to (13). In the end, …”
Section: Diagnostics and Prognosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to find the probability of being at each state in future, the model must be unrolled over the time horizon while there are no observations available from onwards. Hence, prognosis for can also be formulated similar to diagnosis case in a probabilistic manner as follows: (16) where is again included to indicate that calculations are based on the parameter set of the trained HMM and is a normalizing factor replaced by similar to (13). In the end, …”
Section: Diagnostics and Prognosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 8 articles about FIS: [33,76,[83][84][85][86][87][88] and 18 articles for the neuro-fuzzy approach: [33,36,37,41,58,[89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101]. For the inference system, it is important to note that, out of the 8 articles, five articles have the author Balazinski Marek (and Baron Luc for four of these articles) in the author list which explains the similarity in the approaches presented in these articles ( [33,84,[86][87][88]).…”
Section: Presentation Of the Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical features in the TD and FD extracted from vibration and power signals via wavelet packet decomposition were also discussed by Niaki et al [9] and a RNN was used for tool wear estimation; the authors studied the application of sensor information fusion in order to increase the estimation performance of the NN and the results showed that only a maximum of 13% relative error in estimating tool wear. Massol et al [10] studied the relationship between tool condition and several features extracted from force and AE signal, and trained an ANFIS to monitor wear state. The authors developed an eXtended Takagi Sugeno (eXTS) to correlate sensory signals with several cutter health conditions, however, the accuracy of the model on unknown tool parameters is still low.…”
Section: DLmentioning
confidence: 99%