2016
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78252820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Explicit Stiffness Matrix for Parabolic Beam Element

Abstract: This study is devoted to strain-based formulation for a curved beam. Arches with parabolic geometry, which have a variety of applications, belong to this structural type. Dependency of the curvature radius to the arch length creates some complexities in the solution process. To analyze these complex structures, a twonode beam with six degrees of freedom is suggested by utilizing closed-form solution and the stiffness-based finite element method. Considering the effect of shear deformation, and incorporating eq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where D i 1 and D i 2 define the displacement components of an arbitrary point in the longitudinal (x i ) and thickness (z) directions, respectively, whereas d i 1 and d i 2 refer to the displacement field of the neutral axis in the longitudinal (x i ) and thickness (z) directions, respectively. For details about the geometrical definition of this system in its bottom and upper parts can be found in [1]. The relation between the strain components of an arbitrary point and the reference neutral strain field is defined as…”
Section: Theory and Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where D i 1 and D i 2 define the displacement components of an arbitrary point in the longitudinal (x i ) and thickness (z) directions, respectively, whereas d i 1 and d i 2 refer to the displacement field of the neutral axis in the longitudinal (x i ) and thickness (z) directions, respectively. For details about the geometrical definition of this system in its bottom and upper parts can be found in [1]. The relation between the strain components of an arbitrary point and the reference neutral strain field is defined as…”
Section: Theory and Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of system consists of beams with a straight or curved geometry, connected by an elastic layer, with a linear, non-linear, and plastic behavior. Despite the large amount of studies from the literature focusing on the structural behavior of single beams [1][2][3][4], some static and dynamic aspects for coupled beam systems have already been explored in the pioneering works by Seelig and Hoppmann [5] and Dublin and Friedrich [6], drawing increased attention from researchers in the recent years. These studies focused on static and dynamic behavior [7][8][9], transverse vibration [10], and forced vibration [11], using viscously damped interlayer [8,12] among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, transverse shear deformation and rotational inertia effects are taken into account, while cross-sectional distortions and shear lag effects are neglected. Finally, the curved beam element is treated as a circular arc element with a constant radius of curvature for each individual element [16].…”
Section: Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such deformations cause severe changes in strains and stresses. The geometry of the arch is an influential parameter on its load-bearing capacity (Cai et al, 2012;Bateni and Eslami, 2015;Bradford et al, 2015;Rezaiee-Pajand and Rajabzadeh-Safaei, 2016). In addition, various loadings (e.g., the sinusoidal (Plaut and Johnson, 1981), concentrated (Pi et al, 2008;Chandra et al, 2012;Tsiatas and Babouskos, 2017), distributed (Moghaddasie and Stanciulescu, 2013b) and end moment loads (Chen and Liao, 2005;Chen and Lin, 2005)), geometric imperfections (Virgin et al, 2014;Zhou et al, 2015a), and boundary conditions (Pi and Bradford, 2012;Pi and Bradford, 2013;Han et al, 2016) are other important factors in the structural design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%