2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explicit literature review on bearing materials and their defect detection techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, WSO-SVM is used to construct a fault diagnosis model. The highest recognition rate is calculated for the five types of hierarchical entropies under multi-feature extraction, as shown in 7, where (1,5) indicates the combination of nodes with the highest recognition rate for two features are node 1 and node 5, (1,5,6) indicates the combination of nodes with the highest recognition rate for three features are node 1, node 5 and node 6, and so on. It can be seen from Figure 12 that there is almost no overlap based on the WSO-HSlopEn, but the feature distributions of the BF2 and IRF2 samples are relatively low in clustering; for the other hierarchical entropies, the clustering of the feature distributions of the samples are very poor because of their approximate entropy distributions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Hierarchical Entropiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, WSO-SVM is used to construct a fault diagnosis model. The highest recognition rate is calculated for the five types of hierarchical entropies under multi-feature extraction, as shown in 7, where (1,5) indicates the combination of nodes with the highest recognition rate for two features are node 1 and node 5, (1,5,6) indicates the combination of nodes with the highest recognition rate for three features are node 1, node 5 and node 6, and so on. It can be seen from Figure 12 that there is almost no overlap based on the WSO-HSlopEn, but the feature distributions of the BF2 and IRF2 samples are relatively low in clustering; for the other hierarchical entropies, the clustering of the feature distributions of the samples are very poor because of their approximate entropy distributions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Hierarchical Entropiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest recognition rate is calculated for the five types of hierarchical entropies under multi-feature extraction, as shown in Table 7, where (1,5) indicates the combination of nodes with the highest recognition rate for two features are node 1 and node 5, (1,5,6) indicates the combination of nodes with the highest recognition rate for three features are node 1, node 5 and node 6, and so on. Table 7 shows that no matter how many features are extracted, the recognition rate of these ten types of bearing signals using WSO-HSlopEn is higher than that of other hierarchical entropies; additionally, the more features we select, the better the recognition effect we obtain; in the circumstances of multi-features, the recognition rates of WSO-HSlopEn are all higher than 97.5%, yet the highest recognition rates of other hierarchical entropies are all significantly below 97.5%; for WSO-HSlopEn, when five nodes are selected, that is, choosing nodes (1,5,6,7,11), the highest recognition rate of these ten types of bearing signals reaches 100%; however, the highest recognition rate of other entropies is, respectively, 3.80%, 10.53%, 16.73%, and 4.13% lower than that of WSO-HSlopEn. Through the above comparison, we can clearly find the significant advantages of the proposed method based on WSO-HSlopEn, and the recognition results applied to diagnose faults of rolling bearings are higher than those of classic methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Hierarchical Entropiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has been done on the bearing materials. Yadav and Chawla (2021) summarized different bearing materials and different bearing performance detection methods. Yu et al (2005) focused on the properties of high carbon chromium type stainless bearing steel, high temperature stainless bearing steel, nitrogenbearing steel, and other stainless bearing materials, as well as the influence of different smelting processes on the materials.…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Si 3 N 4 exhibits good wear properties, as evidenced by its adoption as rolling bearing balls for hybrid bearings. 5 Monolithic Si 3 N 4 is effective in bearing balls because of the design of the hybrid bearing, which employs the monolithic ceramic in the form of well-polished balls which are under compressive load during operation. However, the authors have shown previously that the Si 3 N 4 balls can cause increased wear of the metal rings in a hybrid bearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%