2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0771(200010/12)13:4<367::aid-bdm357>3.0.co;2-9
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
38
5
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
0

Year Published

Range
2001
2001
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
34
4
3
1

Relationship

3
39

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 42 publications

(36 citation statements)
references

References 54 publications

1
35
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…First, expectations toward another’s trust should reasonably influence one’s interpretation of another’s cooperativeness (cf. Gallucci & Perugini, 2000; see also Note 1)—as also observable in our data (Table S3 in the Supplemental Material)—and, according to a reciprocity account, affect the willingness to behave trustworthily. However, the relation between trustworthiness and expected trust level was only small (Cohen, 1988) and failed to reach statistical significance ( r = .14, p = .058; Table 3).…”
Section: Study
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Also, they point to the specific usefulness of HEX-HH and the higher resolution afforded by the HEXACO model to explain individual variation in trustworthiness and prosocial behavior more generally. the beholder and, for example, depend on the level of trust a trustee expects an interaction partner to place in her (Gallucci & Perugini, 2000). Correspondingly, Berg, Dickhaut, and McCabe (1995) themselves noted that trustees returning nothing "may not have interpreted the [trustor's] decisions as placing a trust" (p. 137, emphasis added).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation